This page has been archived and is being provided for reference purposes only. The page is no longer being updated, and therefore, links on the page may be invalid.
ARS Scientists Working to Reduce Poultry Crop BreaksBy Sharon Durham
May 15, 2001
Two Agricultural Research Service scientists are helping to reduce the chances that poultry will become contaminated by disease-causing bacteria during processing.
Physiologist R. Jeff Buhr and agricultural engineer J. Andra Dickens of the Richard B. Russell Research Center in Athens, Georgia, are currently conducting research to reduce breakage of the birds crop, a pouch in the neck that stores undigested feed.
Rupturing of the crop is a significant source of contamination during processing, because it can harbor pathogens such as salmonella. The crop is always removed during processing, but it breaks about 25 percent of the time, spilling its contents into and on the chicken.
Buhr and Dickens found two related factors that have bearing on whether crops rupture: the direction in which the crop is removed, and the age of the bird at the time of processing. Both factors determine the amount of pressure needed to extract the crop.
For four-week-old broilers, the researchers found it took 2.72 kilograms of pulling pressure to remove the crop, whereas at eight weeks of age, 4.27 kg of pressure was required--a 157 percent increase.
The standard method of pulling the crop from the carcass through the thoracic (chest) cavity also requires greater pulling pressure. Buhr and Dickens found that taking the crop out through the neck resulted in 95 percent of the crops being removed intact. In contrast, only 64 percent of the crops removed through the thoracic cavity exited without rupturing.
It is too early to recommend changes to the processing industry because the laboratory conditions may not carry through to a commercial setting, according to the scientists. In the laboratory, the crop extractions were done manually and not in the automated fashion of poultry processors.
But with a 95 percent intact rate when crops were extracted through the neck, this alternative method should be given consideration in automated commercial evisceration systems, according to Buhr.
ARS is the chief scientific research agency in the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Scientific contacts: R. Jeff Buhr and J. Andra Dickens, ARS Richard B. Russell Agricultural Research Center, Athens, Ga., phone (706) 546-3339, fax (706) 546-3633; email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org.