Skip to main content
ARS Home » Northeast Area » University Park, Pennsylvania » Pasture Systems & Watershed Management Research » Research » Publications at this Location » Publication #192743


item Schmidt, John
item Kleinman, Peter
item Vadas, Peter

Submitted to: ASA-CSSA-SSSA Annual Meeting Abstracts
Publication Type: Abstract Only
Publication Acceptance Date: 4/15/2005
Publication Date: 11/6/2005
Citation: Schmidt, J.P., Allen, A., Kleinman, P.J., Srinivasan, M.S., Vadas, P.A. 2005. Variability in n availability to corn for various landscape positions [abstract]. ASA-CSSA-SSSA Annual Meeting Abstracts. Paper No. 6-23.

Interpretive Summary: An interpretive summary is not required.

Technical Abstract: Understanding nitrogen (N) availability across the landscape is essential to improving N management decisions. This project aims to distinguish and quantify the availability of N to corn at various landscape positions. Two distinctive regions of the Chesapeake Bay watershed were selected for this project, the Maryland Eastern Shore (MES) and the Ridge and Valley (RV) region of Pennsylvania. Four landscape positions were selected at MES: including near a deep (2 - 3 m) ditch, middle of the field, and two positions near a shallow (0 - 0.3 m) ditch. Two landscape positions were selected at the RV site: head slope and toe slope positions. Nitrogen treatments at the midfield position (MES) and both positions at RV include: 0, 56, 112, 168, 224, and 268 kg N per ha applied at planting. At the three other MES positions, N treatments include 0 and 112 kg N per ha. Grain yield increased with N fertilizer at a near-shallow-ditch position at MES (8.8 to 11.0 Mg per ha) and at the head slope position at RV (7.4 to 10.3 Mg per ha). Leaf N content at silking increased between 0 and 112 kg N per ha at all MES positions and for both RV positions. Leaf N content at both near-shallow-ditch positions (MES) indicated that less N was available here (3.0-3.1 %) with 0 kg N per ha compared to the midfield position (3.2 %) and the deep ditch position (3.4 %). Although leaf N content responded to N at both RV positions, N content was consistently greater across all treatments for the toe slope position. At MES sandy soils and a shallow water table play a large role in N availability, while soil depth and N mineralization likely contribute to response differences observed at RV. Understanding these mechanisms and quantifying their impact will provide the appropriate input for developing site-specific N recommendation models.