Author
WARD, KENNETH - ALABAMA A&M UNIVERSITY | |
Danka, Robert | |
WARD, RUFINA - ALABAMA A&M UNIVERSITY |
Submitted to: Journal of Economic Entomology
Publication Type: Peer Reviewed Journal Publication Acceptance Date: 1/31/2008 Publication Date: 6/1/2008 Citation: Ward, K., Danka, R.G., Ward, R. 2008. Comparative Performance of Two Mite-Resistant Stocks of Honey Bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in Alabama Beekeeping Operations. Journal of Economic Entomology. 101(3):654-659. Interpretive Summary: A major issue in beekeeping management is to develop and implement bees with genetic-based resistance to parasitic mites. We tested the utility of two USDA-developed resistant stocks (Russian honey bees and VSH (varroa sensitive hygiene) honey bees) and a standard stock of Italian bees commercially produced in Alabama. During 2004-2006, cooperating beekeepers in northern, central and southern Alabama each kept colonies of the three stocks. We monitored infestations of varroa mites and tracheal mites, and treated only those colonies that had mite levels above established economic thresholds. Throughout the three seasons of measurement, resistant stocks required less treatment against mites than the unselected commercial stock. The total percentages of colonies needing treatment against varroa mites were 12% of VSH, 24% of Russian and 40% of Italian. The total percentages requiring treatment against tracheal mites were 1% of Russian, 8% of VSH and 12% of Italian. Honey production was measured in 2005 and 2006, and the average honey yield of Russian and VSH colonies was comparable to that of Italian colonies each year. Beekeepers did not report any significant behavioral problems with the resistant stocks. These stocks thus have good potential for use in non-migratory beekeeping operations in the southeastern USA. Technical Abstract: The utility of USDA-developed Russian and varroa sensitive hygiene (VSH) honey bees, Apis mellifera L. (Hymenoptera: Apidae), was compared to that of locally produced, commercial Italian bees during 2004-2006 in beekeeping operations in Alabama, USA. Infestations of varroa mites, Varroa destructor Anderson and Truman (Acari: Varroidae), were measured twice each year, and colonies that reached established economic treatment thresholds (1 mite per 100 adult bees in late winter; 5-10 mites per 100 adult bees in late summer) were treated with acaricides. Infestations of tracheal mites, Acarapis woodi (Rennie) (Acari: Tarsonemidae), were measured in autumn and compared to a treatment threshold of 20% mite prevalence. Honey production was measured in 2005 and 2006 for colonies that retained original test queens. Throughout the three seasons of measurement, resistant stocks required less treatment against parasitic mites than the Italian stock. The total percentages of colonies needing treatment against varroa mites were 12% of VSH, 24% of Russian and 40% of Italian. The total percentages requiring treatment against tracheal mites were 1% of Russian, 8% of VSH and 12% of Italian. The average honey yield of Russian and VSH colonies was comparable to that of Italian colonies each year. Beekeepers did not report any significant behavioral problems with the resistant stocks. These stocks thus have good potential for use in non-migratory beekeeping operations in the southeastern USA. |