Skip to main content
ARS Home » Plains Area » Lubbock, Texas » Cropping Systems Research Laboratory » Wind Erosion and Water Conservation Research » Research » Publications at this Location » Publication #315495

Research Project: Managing and Modeling Deficit Irrigation and Limited Rainfall for Crop Production in Semi-Arid Regions

Location: Wind Erosion and Water Conservation Research

Title: Deficit irrigation: Arriving at the crop water stress index via gas exchange measurements

Author
item Baker, Jeff
item Gitz, Dennis
item Payton, Paxton
item Mahan, James
item Mahan, James
item Lascano, Robert

Submitted to: ASA-CSSA-SSSA Annual Meeting Abstracts
Publication Type: Abstract Only
Publication Acceptance Date: 11/2/2014
Publication Date: 11/6/2014
Citation: Baker, J.T., Gitz, D.C., Payton, P.R., Mahan, J.R., Lascano, R.J. 2014. Deficit irrigation: Arriving at the crop water stress index via gas exchange measurements[abstract]. American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society of America Annual Meeting. November 2-6, 2014. Long Beach, California.

Interpretive Summary:

Technical Abstract: Plant gas exchange provides a highly sensitive measure of the degree of drought stress. Canopy temperature (Tc) provides a much easier to acquire indication of crop water deficit that has been used in irrigation scheduling systems, but interpretation of this measurement has proven difficult. Our goal was to test the ability of Tc to quantify the degree of crop water deficit by comparing Tc with simultaneous measurements of cotton leaf-level gas exchange parameters in the field over two growing seasons. Comparisons between Tc and leaf-level gas exchange were accomplished by measuring Tc diurnally with hand-held infrared thermometers and controlling cuvette leaf temperature (TL) equal to Tc and then measuring light saturated leaf level net assimilation (A) and stomatal conductance (g). As plant water deficit became more severe, leaf level gas exchange tended to decline with rising TL. However, we found that A and g could vary by more than twofold at a given TL, indicating that Tc was not a particularly robust indicator of the degree of drought stress. Using regression analysis (MAXR, SAS Institute) we found that variables used by the Crop Water Stress Index (CWSI) were better predictors of the degree of drought stress than TL alone. We conclude that canopy minus air temperature differential (Tc -Ta) either alone or in combination with vapor pressure deficit (VPD) should provide a better predictor of the degree of drought stress than Tc alone.