Skip to main content
ARS Home » Southeast Area » Dawson, Georgia » National Peanut Research Laboratory » Research » Publications at this Location » Publication #222310

Title: Water savings and improved yield stability for irrigated and non-irrigated cotton

item Nuti, Russell
item Sorensen, Ronald - Ron
item Truman, Clinton
item Lamb, Marshall

Submitted to: National Cotton Council Beltwide Cotton Conference
Publication Type: Abstract Only
Publication Acceptance Date: 1/10/2007
Publication Date: 6/1/2007
Citation: Nuti, R.C., Sorensen, R.B., Truman, C.C., Lamb, M.C. 2007. Water savings and improved yield stability for irrigated and non-irrigated cotton. National Cotton Council Beltwide Cotton Conference.

Interpretive Summary: none required.

Technical Abstract: The Southeast U.S. receives 130 cm of annual rainfall, however cotton production is still limited by water. Irrigation, when available, is used to supplement natural precipitation to sustain profitable crop production. Increased water capture would improve water use efficiency and reduce irrigation requirements, thus reducing input costs. Furrow diking is a cost effective management practice that is designed to create a series of depressional storage basins in the furrow between crop rows to catch and retain rainfall and/or irrigation water. Furrow diking has been widely accepted and adopted in arid regions, but has not been adapted for cotton production in the Southeast. The objective of this study was to compare water use efficiency between furrow diked and non-diked cotton in Southwest Georgia. Studies were conducted in irrigated and non-irrigated cotton each year from 2005-2007 at two locations. Water availability (soil water potential) was used to base irrigation timing and validate variability in water capture. In rainfall simulation, furrow diking reduced runoff and erosion by 3.5 times compared to non-diked cotton. Based on rainfall simulation (equal amount over time), furrow diking increased infiltration by 38%, resulting in 7.1 days of estimated plant available water for diked plots and only 3.9 days of estimated plant available water for non-diked plots. The first year of the study had more than average rainfall and all irrigated treatments produced similar yield and net returns. In 2006 and 2007, irrigated furrow diked cotton required an average of 3 inches less water to produce similar cotton yield and net returns. Furrow diking showed an average response over 4 irrigation rates by improving cotton yield by 152 lb/A in 2006. In 2006, furrow diking irrigated cotton improved net return as much as $160/A and improved non-irrigated yield by 58%.