Author
Wesley, Irene | |
Muraoka, Wayne | |
TRAMPEL, D - IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY | |
XIN, H - IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY | |
GREEN, A - IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY |
Submitted to: Meeting Abstract
Publication Type: Abstract Only Publication Acceptance Date: 10/1/2006 Publication Date: 10/1/2006 Citation: Wesley, I.V., Muraoka, W.T., Trampel, D.W., Xin, H., Green, A. 2006. Prevalence of Campylobacter and Salmonella in laying hens in caged high-rise and caged manure-belt and floor aviary housing system [abstract]. Food Safety Consortium 2006 Symposium. October 1-3, 2006, Fayetteville, Arkansas. 2006 CDROM. Interpretive Summary: Technical Abstract: Previous reports have shown the frequency of Campylobacter spp. in organic and conventionally raised broilers. However, the prevalence of Campylobacter in table egg chickens maintained in different housing systems is unknown. The objective of this research was to compare the prevalence of Campylobacter in three types of egg layer housing systems: a) buildings in which hens are confined but kept on the ground (n=4 flocks); b) high-rise buildings with chickens in cages and a manure pit beneath the chickens (n=4 flocks); and c) buildings (n=4 flocks) with chickens in cages and a manure belt beneath the chickens. Four flocks were selected for each of the three housing categories and 10 birds from each of the four flocks were randomly selected to yield a total of 40 birds per housing type. Studies were conducted in the winter to maximize air quality differences between houses. Birds were humanely euthanized and ceca were immediately removed and screened for Campylobacter and Salmonella. Following enrichment and selective plating to Campy Cefex agar, presumptive Campylobacter colonies were identified to the species level by a multiplex PCR. The commercial BAX system was used for screening Salmonella. When the three housing types were compared, the prevalence of Campylobacter spp., especially C. coli, was significantly higher in birds which were confined but kept on the ground (p<0.05). No such differences were seen among flocks in the distribution of C. jejuni or in Salmonella. |