Location: Foreign Disease-Weed Science ResearchTitle: A standardized inoculation protocol to test wheat cultivars for reaction to head blast caused by Magnaporthe oryzae (Triticum pathotype)
|CRUZ, CHRISTIAN - Kansas State University|
|BOCKUS, WILLIAM - Kansas State University|
|STACK, JAMES - Kansas State University|
|VALENT, BARBARA - Kansas State University|
|MACIEL, JOAO - Embrapa|
Submitted to: Plant Health Progress
Publication Type: Peer Reviewed Journal
Publication Acceptance Date: 8/12/2016
Publication Date: 8/30/2016
Publication URL: http://handle.nal.usda.gov/10113/5508057
Citation: Cruz, C.C., Bockus, W.W., Stack, J.P., Valent, B.S., Maciel, J.N., Peterson, G.L. 2016. A standardized inoculation protocol to test wheat cultivars for reaction to head blast caused by Magnaporthe oryzae (Triticum pathotype). Plant Health Progress. 17:186-187.
Interpretive Summary: Wheat blast is a rapidly emerging fungal disease of wheat effecting grain formation in the heads. The disease is currently limited to Brazil, Bolivia, Paraguay, Argentina and more recently, Bangladesh. Control measures are limited and currently there is an international effort to find or develop wheat germplasm that is resistant to the disease. Presented here is a proposed protocol for greenhouse and growth chamber evaluation of wheat cultivars for resistance to wheat blast.This standardization would allow for more direct comparison of results obtained from different researchers worldwide.
Technical Abstract: Wheat blast, caused by the Triticum pathotype of M. oryzae (MoT), poses a significant threat to wheat production worldwide. Because this pathotype does not occur in the U.S., it is important to prepare for its possible introduction. As part of this preparation, over 500 U.S. wheat cultivars were tested for susceptibility or resistance to head blast (Cruz et al. 2012, Cruz et al. 2016). Inoculations were conducted under biosafety-level 3 conditions at Ft. Detrick, Maryland and Kansas State University, Manhattan. However, the protocols to phenotype wheat cultivars vary among researchers (Cruz et al. 2012, Cruz et al. 2016, Maciel et al. 2014). Therefore, in light of the recent outbreak in Bangladesh and the threat to wheat production globally, head blast inoculation protocols need to be standardized so that results can be easily interpreted and shared internationally. The following protocol, based on several years’ experience, is recommended for common use to facilitate direct comparison of disease phenotyping results among researchers. Researchers should grow plants under recommended fertilizer/environmental conditions in a greenhouse or growth chamber until the late boot stage (Feekes 10). Inoculum should be prepared with spores from =7-day-old MoT cultures grown at about 25oC on oat meal agar (heat 50 g of rolled oats in 500 mL water at 70°C for 1 h, squeeze through four layers of cheesecloth, adjust to 1 L with water, add 15 g agar and autoclave) (Valent et al. 1991). Spores significantly older than 7 days begin to loose infectivity. Although several types of atomizers are effective, an airbrush similar to those that accurately apply paint is recommended (Harbor Freight Tools, Camarillo, CA). Within two days of full head emergence from the boot, each head is inoculated with 0.75 ml of a conidial suspension of MoT (20,000 spores/ml in sterile deionized water with 0.42% unflavored gelatine and 0.01% Tween 20). A minimum of 10 heads are inoculated per cultivar-isolate combination and those that show potential resistance are re-tested. To induce infection, inoculated heads are immediately enclosed in 7.4- by 12.4-cm plastic bags with a zipper closure (Uline, Pleasant Prairie, WI) that are moistened on the inside with water from a spray bottle (Fig. 1). Bags are removed 48 h after inoculation. Post inoculation, plants are cultivated at 28±2°C (14-h day) and 23±2°C (10-h night) with at least 150 µmol m-2 s-1 light intensity. Each head is rated 10-14 days post-inoculation for percentage killed spikelets, referred to as the head blast index. Disease ratings are done when the susceptible check cultivar reaches 90-100%. Differences in assessing the rate and amount of disease can occur among researchers, even when using essentially the same protocol. To minimize variance in the head blast index among researchers, inoculated wheat heads should be rated when the head blast index on the susceptible check just reaches 90-100%. Rating cultivars after the susceptible check reaches 100% may mask potentially useful moderately-resistant cultivars as disease may continue to develop on these cultivars over time. In conclusion, investigators using artificial methods to phenotype wheat cultivars for reaction to head blast are encouraged to use this protocol to facilitate worldwide communication of data on the reaction of wheat cultivars to this devastating disease.