Skip to main content
ARS Home » Pacific West Area » Albany, California » Western Regional Research Center » Bioproducts Research » Research » Publications at this Location » Publication #269217

Title: Sodium Bentonite-Based Fire Retardant Coatings Containing Starch

item Glenn, Gregory - Greg
item Bingol, Gokhan
item Chiou, Bor-Sen
item Klamczynski, Artur
item Pan, Zhongli

Submitted to: Fire Sciences Journal
Publication Type: Peer Reviewed Journal
Publication Acceptance Date: 2/5/2012
Publication Date: 4/12/2012
Citation: Glenn, G.M., Bingol, G., Chiou, B., Klamczynski, A., Pan, Z. 2012. Sodium Bentonite-Based Fire Retardant Coatings Containing Starch. Fire Sciences Journal. 51: 85-92.

Interpretive Summary: Wildfires have destroyed thousands of homes in arid wood regions of the country. A fire retardant gel made of sodium bentonite and starch was effective in delaying the burning of test samples exposed to intense heat. The starch component improved the performance of the gel compared to gel with no starch. The findings could help in efforts to develop affordable fire retardants used to protect homes from fires.

Technical Abstract: Sodium bentonite (SB) gel and foam coatings were tested for their ability to suppress the rate of heat increase at the surface of commercial lap siding. Starch was added to some treatments to determine whether it stabilized the coating and prevented vertical slumping. A commercial fire protection gel coating was included in the study for comparison. Coatings containing starch and the SB gel sample had negligible slumping during burn tests while the commercial gel and the SB foam slumped severely during the test. In rheological tests, samples containing starch had higher G’, G”, and higher yield stress. The commercial gel had the lowest G’, G”, yield stress, and compressive stress. Surprisingly, the samples containing starch heated more slowly than samples without starch. This could be explained, in part, by the char residue that formed during the burn test that shielded the substrate surface from direct heat exposure. Drying tests were performed at 44°C to determine how long the coatings could remain hydrated under severe conditions. The SB gel coatings remained hydrated longer than the SB foam samples. Starch prolonged the drying time for both the SB foam and gel samples.