Range Management Research Site Logo
ARS Home About Us Helptop nav spacerContact Us En Espanoltop nav spacer
Printable VersionPrintable Version     E-mail this pageE-mail this page
Agricultural Research Service United States Department of Agriculture
Search
  Advanced Search
 
Programs and Projects
Subjects of Investigation
Ecological Site Descriptions
Monitoring & Assessment
Long Term Ecological Research
Long Term Agricultural Research
Landscape Toolbox
Data Catalogs
EcoTrends
 

Research Project: MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES FOR ARID RANGELANDS

Location: Range Management Research

Title: When bulk density methods matter: Implications for estimating soil organic carbon pools in rocky soils

Authors
item Throop, Heather -
item Archer, Steve -
item Monger, H. Curtis -
item Waltman, S. -

Submitted to: Journal of Arid Environments
Publication Type: Peer Reviewed Journal
Publication Acceptance Date: August 31, 2011
Publication Date: November 1, 2011
Citation: Throop, H.L., Archer, S.R., Monger, H., Waltman, S. 2011. When bulk density methods matter: Implications for estimating soil organic carbon pools in rocky soils. Journal of Arid Environments. 77:66-71.

Interpretive Summary: Resolving uncertainty in the carbon cycle is paramount to refining climate predictions. Soil organic carbon (SOC) is a major component of terrestrial C pools, and accuracy of SOC estimates are only as good as the measurements and assumptions used to obtain them. Dryland soils account for a substantial portion of global SOC, but the pool dynamics are highly uncertain. One crucial component of accurate estimates of SOC on an areal basis is bulk density (pb), the mass of soil per unit volume. Here, we review methods used for calculating pb and assess their prevalence. We show how treatment of coarse fragments (particles >2 mm diameter) influences pb values and discuss the implications for SOC estimates in drylands. In four dryland examples, methods that varied in their treatment of coarse fragments led to substantial (up to 26%) differences in pb. Calculated SOC pools responded proportionally, with SOC differing by up to 518 g C m 2. We suggest a revised method for accounting for coarse fractions in pb calculations. Large portions of the world’s soils, particularly in drylands, are fine enough to allow pb determination with cores, but contain coarse fragments that substantially impact SOC mass estimates if not explicitly considered.

Technical Abstract: Resolving uncertainty in the carbon cycle is paramount to refining climate predictions. Soil organic carbon (SOC) is a major component of terrestrial C pools, and accuracy of SOC estimates are only as good as the measurements and assumptions used to obtain them. Dryland soils account for a substantial portion of global SOC, but the pool dynamics are highly uncertain. One crucial component of accurate estimates of SOC on an areal basis is bulk density (pb), the mass of soil per unit volume. Here, we review methods used for calculating pb and assess their prevalence. We show how treatment of coarse fragments (particles >2 mm diameter) influences pb values and discuss the implications for SOC estimates in drylands. In four dryland examples, methods that varied in their treatment of coarse fragments led to substantial (up to 26%) differences in pb. Calculated SOC pools responded proportionally, with SOC differing by up to 518 g C m 2. We suggest a revised method for accounting for coarse fractions in pb calculations. Large portions of the world’s soils, particularly in drylands, are fine enough to allow pb determination with cores, but contain coarse fragments that substantially impact SOC mass estimates if not explicitly considered.

   

 
Project Team
Estell, Richard - Rick
Lucero, Mary
Peters, Debra - Deb
Havstad, Kris
Rango, Albert - Al
Herrick, Jeffrey - Jeff
Anderson, Dean
Bestelmeyer, Brandon
 
Publications
   Publications
 
Related National Programs
  Pasture, Forage and Rangeland Systems (215)
 
 
Last Modified: 05/18/2013
ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links 
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House