Natural Products Utilization Research Site Logo
ARS Home About Us Helptop nav spacerContact Us En Espanoltop nav spacer
Printable VersionPrintable Version     E-mail this pageE-mail this page
Agricultural Research Service United States Department of Agriculture
Search
  Advanced Search
 
Programs and Projects
Subjects of Investigation
 

Title: THE CURRENT STATUS AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF GLYPHOSATE-RESISTANT CROPS: A REVIEW

Authors
item Cerdeira, Antonio - EMBRAPA-BRAZIL AG DEPT.
item Duke, Stephen

Submitted to: Journal of Environmental Quality
Publication Type: Review Article
Publication Acceptance Date: April 2, 2006
Publication Date: September 1, 2006
Citation: Cerdeira, A.L., Duke, S.O. 2006. The current status and environmental impacts of glyphosate-resistant crops: a review. Journal of Environmental Quality. 35: 1633-1658.

Technical Abstract: Glyphosate [N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine]-resistant crops (GRCs), canola (Brassica napus L.), cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) maize (Zea mays L.), and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.], have been commercialized and grown extensively in the Western Hemisphere and, to a lesser extent, elsewhere. Glyphosate-resistant cotton and soybean have become dominant in those countries where they can be grown. Effects of glyphosate on contamination of soil, water, and air are minimal, compared to that caused by some of the herbicides that they replace. No risks have been found with food or feed safety or nutritional value in products from currently available GRCs. GRCs have promoted the adoption of reduced- or no-tillage agriculture in the USA and Argentina. Weed species in GRC fields have shifted to those that can more successfully withstand glyphosate or to those that avoid the time of its application. At least one weed species [Conyza Canadensis (L.) Cronq.] has evolved resistance to glyphosate in GRCs. GRCs have greater potential to become problems as volunteer crops than do conventional crops. Glyphosate resistance transgenes have been found in fields of canola that are supposed to be non-transgenic. Under some circumstances, transgene flow (introgression) from GRCs to related species that might become problems in natural ecosystems may be the largest risk of GRCs. Glyphosate resistance transgenes themselves are highly unlikely to be a risk in wild populations, but when linked to transgenes that may impart fitness benefits outside of agriculture (e.g., insect resistance), and natural ecosystems could be affected. The development and use of failsafe introgression barriers in crops with such linked genes is needed.

   
 
 
Last Modified: 05/24/2013
ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links 
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House