Skip to main content
ARS Home » Research » Publications at this Location » Publication #145196

Title: FAST ANALYSIS OF BEVERAGES USING A MASS SPECTRAL BASED CHEMICAL SENSOR

Author
item KINTON, VANESSA - GERSTEL, BALTIMORE, MD
item COLLINS, ROBERT - GERSTEL, BALTIMORE, MD
item KOLAHGAR, BITA - GERSTEL, GERMANY
item Goodner, Kevin

Submitted to: Meeting Abstract
Publication Type: Abstract Only
Publication Acceptance Date: 2/6/2003
Publication Date: N/A
Citation: N/A

Interpretive Summary:

Technical Abstract: Detection of adulteration, contamination or inconsistencies in food and flavor samples should be accurate and fast. Chemical sensors are ideal for these types of applications because they provide fast measurement times (2-6 minutes). While analysis times are crucial, accuracy and precision of the analysis should never be compromised. It is therefore desirable to use reliable and stable technology that is robust to environmental changes such as humidity or temperature. Quadrupole mass spectrometry is a robust technique that has been widely used in food and flavor applications. In this study, mass spectral fingerprints of three different beverages were obtained by direct transfer of their headspace into a mass spectrometer without chromatographic separation. Standard samples were used to train the chemical sensor with acceptable mass spectral profiles. Adulteration of wine samples was modeled with two different types of wines; contamination was detected by spiking orange juice with diacetyl and inconsistencies in product was modeled by analyzing beer samples freshly opened and aged 3 and 6 days. Detection of contamination, adulteration and product inconsistencies was easily determined using chemometric models. In particular, principal component analysis (PCA) easily detected anomalies by projection of the mass spectral fingerprints into the space of the first three principal components. Adulteration of the wine standards was detected at the low percentage range while diacetyl concentrations in orange juice were detected at the low ppm range. Slight differences between beer samples freshly opened and aged 3 and 6 days.