Skip to main content
ARS Home » Research » Publications at this Location » Publication #121606

Title: ESTIMATING EVAPOTRANSPIRATION WITH ASTER THERMAL INFRARED IMAGERY

Author
item French, Andrew
item Schmugge, Thomas
item Kustas, William - Bill

Submitted to: IEEE IGARSS Annual Proceedings
Publication Type: Abstract Only
Publication Acceptance Date: 3/20/2001
Publication Date: N/A
Citation: N/A

Interpretive Summary:

Technical Abstract: The recent availability of multi-band thermal infrared imagery from the ASTER sensor has made feasible spatial estimation of evapotranspiration at 90 meter resolution. One critical variable in evapotranspiration models is surface temperature. With ASTER the temperature can be reliably determined over a wide range of vegetative conditions. The requirements for accurate temperature measurement include minimization of atmospheric effects, correction for surface emissivity variations and sufficient resolution for the type of vegetative cover. When ASTER imagery are combined with meteorological observations, these requirements are usually met and result in surface temperatures accurate within 1-2 C°. Other sensors, such as Landsat TM and AVHRR, do not meet these requirements because they either lack the resolution of ASTER, or because their broadband radiometers cannot correct for surface emissivity. ASTER-based evapotranspiration estimates for a few days during 2000-2001 were made over two different regions: sub-humid grazing and wheat lands in central Oklahoma and semi-arid rangeland in southern New Mexico. Daily evapotranspiration was estimated by applying instantaneous ASTER surface temperatures, as well as ASTER-based vegetation indices from visible-near infrared bands, to a two-source energy flux model and combining the result with separately acquired hourly solar radiation data. The estimates of surface fluxes show reasonable agreement (50-100 W/m^2) with ground-based eddy-correlation measurements and illustrate how ASTER measurements can be applied to heterogeneous terrain. There are some discrepancies, however, and these may in part be due to difficulty quantifying fractional cover of