Skip to main content
ARS Home » Southeast Area » Stoneville, Mississippi » Genomics and Bioinformatics Research » Research » Publications at this Location » Publication #425279

Research Project: Integrative Applied Agricultural Genomics and Bioinformatics Research

Location: Genomics and Bioinformatics Research

Title: Transcriptome analysis of the 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D)-tolerant cotton chromosome substitution line CS-B15sh and its susceptible parental lines G. hirsutum L. cv. Texas Marker-1 and G. barbadense L. cv. Pima 379

Author
item PEREZ, LOIDA - Mississippi State University
item MAULEON, RAMIL - Southern Cross University
item ARICK II, MARK - Mississippi State University
item MAGBANUA, ZENAIDA - Mississippi State University
item PETERSON, DANIEL - Mississippi State University
item DEAN, JEFFREY - Mississippi State University
item TSENG, TE MING - Mississippi State University

Submitted to: Frontiers in Plant Science
Publication Type: Peer Reviewed Journal
Publication Acceptance Date: 7/21/2022
Publication Date: 8/22/2022
Citation: Perez, L.M., Mauleon, R., Arick Ii, M.A., Magbanua, Z.V., Peterson, D.G., Dean, J.F., Tseng, T. 2022. Transcriptome analysis of the 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D)-tolerant cotton chromosome substitution line CS-B15sh and its susceptible parental lines G. hirsutum L. cv. Texas Marker-1 and G. barbadense L. cv. Pima 379. Frontiers in Plant Science. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.910369.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.910369

Interpretive Summary: The chemical 2,4-D is widely used to kill broadleaf plants without damaging grasses. Upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.), a broadleaf plant, is damaged by 2,4-D, but it has been noted that an Upland cotton line containing part of a chromosome arm from the related species G. barbadense, does not move as much 2,4-D through its tissues as regular Upland cotton and thus is more resistant to 2,4-D. We sequenced expressed genes (i.e., mRNA) from the chromosome substitution line (known as CS-B15sh), normal Upland cotton (line TM-1), and normal G. barbadense (line Pima 379) and compared their gene expression patterns. Several genes that are differentially expressed in CS-B15sh compared to TM-1 and/or Pima 379 may be responsible for the 2,4-D tolerance of CS-B15sh. Further study of these genes could be useful in development of 2,4-D-resistant Upland cotton; fields containing 2,4-D-resistant cotton could be treated with 2,4-D effectively minimizing competition between the Upland cotton seedlings and broadleaf weeds.

Technical Abstract: The cotton chromosome substitution line, CS-B15sh, exhibits 41% lower injury from 2,4-D when applied at the field recommended rate of 1.12 kg ae ha-1 (1×) than does Texas Marker-1 (TM-1). CS-B15sh was developed in the genetic background of Gossypium hirsutum L. cv TM-1 and has chromosome introgression on the short arm of chromosome 15 from Gossypium barbadense L. cv. Pima 379. In a previous experiment, we observed reduced translocation of [14C]2,4-D outside the treated leaf tissue in CS-B15sh, which contrasted with an increased translocation of the herbicide in the tissues above and below the treated leaf in TM-1. Our results indicate a potential 2,4-D tolerance mechanism in CS-B15sh involving altered movement of 2,4-D. Here, we used RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) to determine the differential expression of genes between 2,4-D-challenged and control plants of the tolerant (CS-B15sh) and susceptible lines (TM-1 and Pima 379). Several components of the 2,4-D/auxin-response pathway—including ubiquitin E3 ligase, PB1|AUX/IAA, ARF transcription factors, and F-box proteins of the SCFTIR1/AFB complex—were upregulated with at least threefold higher expression in TM-1 compared with CS-B15sh, while both Pima 379 and TM-1 showed the same fold change expression for PB1|AUX/IAA mRNA. Some genes associated with herbicide metabolism, including flavin monooxygenase (Gohir.A01G174100) and FAD-linked oxidase (Gohir.D06G002600), exhibited at least a twofold increase in CS-B15sh than in TM-1 (the gene was not expressed in Pima 379), suggesting a potential relationship between the gene’s expression and 2,4-D tolerance. It is interesting to note that glutathione S-transferase was differentially expressed in both CS-B15sh and Pima 379 but not in TM-1, while cytochrome P450 and other genes involved in the oxidation–reduction process were significantly expressed only in CS-B15sh in response to 2,4-D. Gene set enrichment analysis on the union DEGs of the three cotton genotypes revealed the depletion of transcripts involved in photosynthesis and enrichment of transcripts involved in ABA response and signaling.