Data and code from: Environmental influences on the drying rate of spray applied disinfestants from horticultural production surfaces

Authors: Read, Quentin; Copes, Warren; Smith, Barbara

Submitted to: Ag Data Commons
Publication Type: Database / Dataset
Publication Acceptance Date: 6/25/2025
Publication Date: 7/28/2025
Citation: Read, Q.D., Copes, W.E., Smith, B.J. 2025. Data and code from: Environmental influences on the drying rate of spray applied disinfestants from horticultural production surfaces. Ag Data Commons. https://doi.org/10.15482/USDA.ADC/25673073.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15482/USDA.ADC/25673073

Interpretive Summary: This dataset includes all the data and R code needed to reproduce the analyses in a forthcoming manuscript in the journal PhytoFrontiers. We import the data and fit a Bayesian statistical model that compares how quickly different spray-applied disinfestants dry, depending on what chemical was sprayed, what surface material it was sprayed onto, and what the weather conditions were at the time. We use the statistical model to generate predictions and compare mean drying rates between the disinfestants, surface materials, and weather conditions. We create tables and figures for the manuscript. Please see the interpretive summary of the associated manuscript for more details on our findings.

Technical Abstract: This is a dataset including all data and R code required to reproduce the results in a manuscript forthcoming in the journal PhytoFrontiers. The abstract of the associated manuscript follows. Drying rates of disinfestants commonly applied to horticultural plant production surfaces were evaluated under cool to hot weather and under laboratory conditions to characterize the range of drying times and how this relates to contact times specified on product labels. Drying rates of six disinfestants [isopropyl alcohol (IPA), two quaternary ammonium compounds (QACs), two peroxygen compounds (PXs), sodium hypochlorite (bleach)] and water were evaluated when applied to six substrate materials (concrete, galvanized metal, polypropylene ground fabric, polypropylene plastic sheet, pressure-treated pine, and twin-wall clear polycarbonate) based on the weather variables of solar radiation, temperature, and relative humidity. Differences were evident at the point of application. Disinfestants with low (IPA, both QACs and one PX) and high (bleach, one PX and water) surface tension provided approximately 100% and 60% coverage, respectively, when applied to horizontal, non-porous solid materials. Disinfestants applied to horizontal porous materials (concrete, fabric and wood) persisted on the surface for a mean of only 9 to 113 sec because solutions were actively drawn into the substrates internal structure. Disinfestants applied to vertical twin-wall greenhouse material flowed off, while retaining only a maximum beaded wetness coverage of 14%. A Bayesian analysis procedure was used to model drying effects of disinfestants correlated with substrate and weather variables based on posterior marginal and prediction trends. Generally, the fastest drying rate occurred in the first 2.5 min and approximately 50% of coverage was retained by 5 min. The evaporative process was variable with distinct interactions occurring between the experimental variables.