Potential impacts of groundwater pumping on stream temperature are greatest in streams with substantial cold groundwater inflows

Authors: Lapides, Dana; ZIPPER, S. - Kansas Geological Survey; HAMMOND, J.C. - Us Geological Survey (USGS)

Submitted to: Hydrological Processes
Publication Type: Peer Reviewed Journal
Publication Acceptance Date: 2/5/2026
Publication Date: 3/12/2026
Citation: Lapides, D.A., Zipper, S., Hammond, J. 2026. Potential impacts of groundwater pumping on stream temperature are greatest in streams with substantial cold groundwater inflows. Hydrological Processes. 40(3). Article e70444. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.70444.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.70444

Interpretive Summary: It is well-known that groundwater pumping can reduce surface water resources by capturing water that would have become streamflow – this is known as ’streamflow depletion’. However, relatively little is known about how groundwater pumping can affect stream temperature. In this study, we calculated potential effects of groundwater pumping on stream temperature for streams across the United States using models of streamflow depletion and stream water temperature. We found that changes in water temperature caused by streamflow depletion tend to be the largest in streams where much of the flow is sourced from relatively cold groundwater, with the greatest impacts on maximum annual stream temperatures and the range of stream temperatures over the year. This suggests that areas like the northern United States might be at the greatest risk of stream temperature changes caused by groundwater pumping, and that monitoring maximum temperature and annual temperature range can help identify when and where streams are affected.

Technical Abstract: Groundwater pumping-induced reductions in streamflow (known as ‘streamflow depletion’) have been documented worldwide, but potential impacts of streamflow depletion on stream temperature are not well understood. Here, we use two types of models to identify potential impacts of pumping on stream temperature across the conterminous United States (CONUS) to determine which aspects of a stream's annual thermograph (thermal signatures) can be used to monitor and manage streamflow depletion impacts on stream temperature. We used long-term streamflow and stream temperature data from 30 streamgages across CONUS and surrogate models of streamflow depletion to analyse potential stream temperature impacts at each site. We compared two different stream temperature modelling approaches: (i) a process-based energy balance model and (ii) statistical regression models based on air temperature and stream discharge. We calculated a suite of thermal signatures under depleted and non-depleted conditions for each stream and found that maximum annual 7-day temperature and annual temperature range are potentially the most sensitive to streamflow depletion, with potential changes of at least 2°C at >'70% of the sites when using the process-based model. We also found that the regression-based models predicted much less sensitivity of stream temperature to streamflow depletion than the process-based model. This work provides an initial evaluation and sensitivity analysis of the potential impacts of streamflow depletion on stream temperature. We demonstrate that stream temperature may be most sensitive to pumping in streams with a high proportion of flow sourced from relatively cold groundwater inputs, and that regression-based stream temperature models may underpredict stream temperature changes caused by streamflow depletion.