Location: Crop Genetics and Breeding Research
Title: Lessons learned: the importance of biological curationAuthor
FOUNTAIN, J - Mississippi State University | |
CLEVENGER, J - Hudsonalpha Institute For Biotechnology | |
Vaughn, Justin | |
Guo, Baozhu |
Submitted to: Microbiology Resource Announcements
Publication Type: Research Notes Publication Acceptance Date: 7/7/2021 Publication Date: 12/2/2021 Citation: Fountain, J., Clevenger, J., Vaughn, J.N., Guo, B. 2021. Lessons learned: the importance of biological curation. Microbiology Resource Announcements. Volume 10 Issue 48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/MRA.00473-21 Interpretive Summary: Not required. Technical Abstract: Proper species identification of sequenced fungal isolates or strains is imperative for the interpretation of genomics data. Through this letter of Houbraken et al. to Editor of Microbiology Resource Announcements and another recently published BMC Research Notes by Chang et al., it has come to our attention that one of the isolates presented in our previous publication in this journal of Microbiology Resource Announcements was misidentified. The presumptive Aspergillus parasiticus isolate NRRL 2999 has been shown to be an A. flavus isolate, a clonal derivative of A. flavus NRRL 3357 by Chang et al. Since there are two genome sequence datasets for A. parasiticus SU-1 in NCBI and A. parasiticus SU-1 and NRRL 2999 are actually the same isolate, we plan to remove the current sequence data for the misidentified “NRRL 2999” from NCBI. However, this situation does highlight the danger inherent in large scale genome sequencing experiments where the identity of isolates is presumed correct based on identification provided by the source of an isolate. Therefore, we must join with Houbraken et al. in agreement that additional safeguards be taken to ensure the proper identification of isolates before conclusions are made based on sequencing data. |