|Gao, Jungang - Texas Agrilife Research|
|Sheshukov, Aleksey - Kansas State University|
|Yen, Haw - Texas Agrilife Research|
Submitted to: Catena
Publication Type: Peer Reviewed Journal
Publication Acceptance Date: 4/7/2017
Publication Date: 5/5/2017
Publication URL: https://handle.nal.usda.gov/10113/5671953
Citation: Gao, J., Sheshukov, A.Y., Yen, H., White, M.J. 2017. Impacts of alternative climate information on hydrologic processes with SWAT: A comparison of NCDC, PRISM and NEXRAD datasets. Catena. 156:353-364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2017.04.010.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2017.04.010 Interpretive Summary: There are several differing kinds of climate data that hydrologic model can use. The National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) has traditional ground based weather stations and gridded Next Generation Weather Radar (NEXRAD) precipitation estimates. Another gridded source is the Parameter–Elevation Regressions on Independent Slopes Model (PRISM), a mix of modeled and observed data. These sources were evaluated in a central plains watershed using the SWAT model to see which was able to most accurately replicate measured streamflow. All models performed well but overestimated streamflow in dry years and underestimated streamflow in wet years. Of the three climate sources the PRISM based model reproduced streamflow the best.
Technical Abstract: Precipitation and temperature are two primary drivers that significantly affect hydrologic processes in a watershed. A network of land-based National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) weather stations has been typically used as a primary source of climate input for agro-ecosystem models. However, the network may lack the density to adequately capture spatial climate variability throughout large watersheds. High-resolution weather datasets based on 4 km × 4 km grid, such as Next Generation Weather Radar (NEXRAD) and Parameter–Elevation Regressions on Independent Slopes Model (PRISM), have become increasingly available as alternatives to conventional land-based networks. The goal of this study was to evaluate impacts of the three weather datasets, NCDC, NEXRAD, and PRISM, on hydrologic processes in an agricultural catchment in Kansas. A method of collecting and processing three sets of weather input datasets was developed and applied to a calibrated Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model for the Smoky Hill River watershed (SHRW) in west-central Kansas, which is sparsely covered by NCDC weather stations with fair to poor range of NEXRAD coverage. SHRW is a typical agricultural catchment in the Central Great Plains; research findings here may be applicable to large areas of the US with similar topography and climate conditions. The SWAT model based on PRISM dataset was able to capture daily streamflow alterations with a greater accuracy compared to NCDC and NEXRAD based SWAT models. With three different weather inputs, SWAT with NCDC consistently overestimated monthly stream discharges, while the SWAT models based on NEXRAD and PRISM datasets tended to underestimate monthly high flows of over 8 m3 s- 1 and overestimate monthly low flows of below 1 m3 s- 1. In general, all models overestimated streamflow in dry years and underestimated streamflow in wet years, however, the PRISM-based model generated smaller bias than the models utilizing NEXRAD or NCDC. The use of PRISM resulted in better statistical performance metrics for streamflow. The conducted study suggests that gridded weather datasets can significantly improve simulated streamflow at daily, monthly and yearly scales as compared to traditional land-based networks.