Skip to main content
ARS Home » Pacific West Area » Burns, Oregon » Range and Meadow Forage Management Research » Research » Publications at this Location » Publication #344005

Research Project: Restoring and Managing Great Basin Ecosystems

Location: Range and Meadow Forage Management Research

Title: Quaking aspen woodland after conifer control: herbaceous dynamics

Author
item Bates, Jonathan - Jon
item Davies, Kirk

Submitted to: Forest Ecology and Management
Publication Type: Peer Reviewed Journal
Publication Acceptance Date: 11/15/2017
Publication Date: 1/5/2018
Citation: Bates, J.D., Davies, K.W. 2018. Quaking aspen woodland after conifer control: herbaceous dynamics. Forest Ecology and Management. 409:307-316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2017.11.032.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2017.11.032

Interpretive Summary: Western juniper is replacing quaking aspen stands in the northern Great Basin. Restoring aspen woodlands is important because they provide wildlife habitat and a diverse forage base for livestock. We measured herbaceous changes for 15 years following fall and spring burning treatments to control juniper in aspen woodlands. Spring burning resulted in greater recovery of the herbaceous layer while maintaining a more diverse native understory than fall burning. The severe fire effects from fall burning aspen woodlands requires reseeding of native perennials to maintain understory composition and diversity and limit exotics.

Technical Abstract: Western juniper (Juniperus occidentalis Hook.) woodlands are replacing lower elevation (< 2100 m) quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) stands in the northern Great Basin. Restoring aspen woodlands is important because they provide wildlife habitat for many species and contain a high diversity of understory shrubs and herbaceous species. We measured herbaceous cover, density, and diversity for 15 years following two juniper control treatments in aspen woodlands. Treatments included cutting one-third of mature juniper trees followed by early fall burning (Fall), cutting two-thirds of the juniper followed by early spring burning (Spring), and untreated woodlands (Control). Juniper were selective cut to increase dry surface fuels to carry fire and kill the remaining conifers. The Fall treatment resulted in significant initial reductions in herbaceous cover and a long-term reduction in perennial forb cover and diversity. Herbaceous recovery in the fall treatment was dominated by non-native species which represented about 68% of total herbaceous cover. By the end of the study the main non-natives in the fall treatment were Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis) and cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum L.). In contrast, native perennials in Spring and Control treatments represented, on average, above 60% of total herbaceous cover. Herbaceous cover in the Spring treatment increased and was greater than the Fall treatment and the Control. Perennial forb cover in the Spring treatment was 2- and 6-times greater than Control and Fall treatments, respectively. Perennial forb density was about 7 times greater in the Spring than Fall treatment. Because of lower fire severity, spring burning resulted in greater recovery of the herbaceous layer while maintaining a more diverse native understory than fall burning. The severe fire effects from fall burning aspen woodlands probably requires reseeding of native perennials to maintain understory composition and diversity and limit exotics.