Location: Children's Nutrition Research Center
Title: National Academies report has broad supportAuthor
![]() |
VINCELLI, PAUL - University Of Kentucky |
![]() |
JACKSON-SMITH, DOUGLAS - The Ohio State University |
![]() |
HOLSAPPLE, MICHAEL - Michigan State University |
![]() |
Grusak, Michael |
![]() |
HARSH, MATTHEW - Concordia University |
![]() |
KLEIN, THEODORE - Society For In Vitro Biology |
![]() |
LAMBERT, JAMES - University Of Virginia |
![]() |
LANGE, MARKUS - Washington State University |
![]() |
MURPHY, ANGUS - University Of Maryland |
![]() |
MCCLUSKEY, JILL - Washington State University |
![]() |
MURPHY, ANGUS - University Of Maryland |
![]() |
NEUHOUSER, MARIAN - Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center |
![]() |
PRAY, CARL - Rutgers University |
![]() |
WELLER, SUSAN - University Of Nebraska |
Submitted to: Nature Biotechnology
Publication Type: Other Publication Acceptance Date: 3/3/2017 Publication Date: 4/11/2017 Citation: Vincelli, P., Jackson-Smith, D., Holsapple, M., Grusak, M.A., Harsh, M., Klein, T., Lambert, J., Lange, M.B., Murphy, A., McCluskey, J., Murphy, A., Neuhouser, M.L., Pray, C., Weller, S. 2017. National Academies report has broad support. Nature Biotechnology. 35(4):304-306. Interpretive Summary: Technical Abstract: Last December, the U.S. National Academy of Sciences (NAS) Board of Agriculture and Natural Resources convened a Forum of Scientific Society Leaders on Genetically-Engineered Crops: Experiences and Prospects. Invited participants were representatives of professional scientific societies or other organizations with an interest in the science behind the agronomic, health, environmental, and socioeconomic implications of genetically engineered (GE) crops. They were asked to comment on the scientific validity of the findings and recommendations of the NAS GE crops report released in May 2016 and to suggest future directions. The participants represented 17 major scientific societies and independent research organizations and thousands of scholars working on GE-crop-related research. Forum participants expressed general support for the majority of the report findings, offering a nuanced and appreciative view of its contents. |