Author
HEINRICHS, A - Pennsylvania State University | |
HEINRICHS, B - Pennsylvania State University | |
JONES, COLLEEN - Pennsylvania State University | |
ERICKSON, PETER - University Of New Hampshire | |
Kalscheur, Kenneth | |
NENNICH, TAMILLEE - Purdue University | |
HEINS, BRAD - University Of Minnesota | |
CARDOSO, FELIPE - University Of Illinois |
Submitted to: Journal of Dairy Science
Publication Type: Peer Reviewed Journal Publication Acceptance Date: 6/14/2017 Publication Date: N/A Citation: N/A Interpretive Summary: Estimating Holstein heifer body weight from heart girth measurements is needed, as many farms do not have animal scales to make the management decisions that require knowledge of body weight. The correlation between heart girth and body weight is known to vary with differing animal conformation. The previous equation to correlate these two measures for Holstein dairy heifers was done 25 years ago. New data derived from six U.S. Experiment Stations that are part of Regional Research Project NC 2042: Management Systems to Improve the Economic and Environmental Sustainability of Dairy Enterprises were used to evaluate this relationship. After deriving a new equation from a data set of observations and using a second validation data set, it was determined that the equation developed in 1992 was still valid, and further equation development is not needed at this time. Technical Abstract: The estimation of Holstein heifer body weight (BW) from heart girth (HG) measurements is needed as many farms do not have animal scales to make the management decisions that require BW. The correlation between HG and BW is known to vary with differing animal conformation. The previous equation to correlate the two measures for Holstein dairy heifers was done 25 years ago. Data were derived from six U.S. Experiment Stations that are part of Regional Research Project NC 2042: Management Systems to Improve the Economic and Environmental Sustainability of Dairy Enterprises. After deriving a new equation from a data set of observations and using a second validation data set, it was determined that the equation developed in 1992 was still valid, and further equation development is not needed at this time. |