Author
![]() |
RANSOM, C - University Of Missouri |
![]() |
Kitchen, Newell |
![]() |
CAMBERATO, J - Purdue University |
![]() |
CARTER, P - Dupont Pioneer Hi-Bred |
![]() |
FERGUSON, R - University Of Nebraska |
![]() |
FERNANDEZ, F - University Of Minnesota |
![]() |
FRANZEN, D - North Dakota State University |
![]() |
LABOSKI, C.A.M. - University Of Wisconsin |
![]() |
NAFZIGER, E - University Of Illinois |
![]() |
SAWYER, J - Iowa State University |
![]() |
SHANAHAN, J - Dupont Pioneer Hi-Bred |
Submitted to: ASA-CSSA-SSSA Annual Meeting Abstracts
Publication Type: Abstract Only Publication Acceptance Date: 8/30/2016 Publication Date: N/A Citation: N/A Interpretive Summary: Technical Abstract: Publicly-available nitrogen (N) rate recommendation tools are utilized to help maximize yield in corn production. These tools often fail when N is over-applied and results in excess N being lost to the environment, or when N is under-applied and results in decreased yield and economic returns. Performance of a tool is often based on the specific soil and weather conditions of a growing season. Research is needed to determine which tools are the most effective at recommending economical optimal N rates (EONR) under varying soil and weather conditions. Research on N response plots is ongoing to evaluate publically-available recommendation tools across eight Midwest states. This presentation will summarize 2014 and 2015 research. Two sites from each state, resulting in a range of historically productive sites, were used to evaluate differences in soil and weather environments. Performance of publicly-available tools for making N fertilizer recommendations are contrasted in this presentation. Tools to be compared include pre-plant soil nitrate test, pre-sidedress soil nitrate test, maximum return to N (MRTN), crop canopy sensor, and the Maize-N crop growth model. Analysis will include tool performance by site-specific soil and weather environments to understand the universality of each tool. |