Location: Soil and Water Management ResearchTitle: Corn yield and water use efficiency under contrasting irrigation application methods: an AquaCrop study contrasting subsurface drip and sprinkler irrigation methods
|EL MOKH, FATHIA - Institute Of The Arid Regions|
|Evett, Steven - Steve|
|Brauer, David - Dave|
Submitted to: ASA-CSSA-SSSA Annual Meeting Abstracts
Publication Type: Abstract Only
Publication Acceptance Date: 9/1/2014
Publication Date: 11/2/2014
Citation: El Mokh, F., Colaizzi, P.D., Evett, S.R., Brauer, D.K. 2014. Corn yield and water use efficiency under contrasting irrigation application methods: an AquaCrop study contrasting subsurface drip and sprinkler irrigation methods [abstract] ASA-CSSA-SSSA Annual Meeting.
Technical Abstract: Grain corn (Zea mays, L.) is sensitive to soil water availability, which can be influenced by irrigation application method. Four facts motivate deficit irrigation of corn in this region. First, declining Ogallala aquifer well yields limit water availability and thus the area of land that can be irrigated fully. Second, mild reductions of irrigation have been shown to increase yield since the full irrigation practice in this region often results in over irrigation and loss of nutrients to deep percolation. Third, the water use efficiency of corn has been shown to increase with mild deficit irrigation. Fourth, it is known that evaporative losses from the soil surface are reduced with subsurface drip irrigation (SDI) in the semi-arid Southern High Plains, and deficit irrigation may be practiced with less risk using SDI. A study contrasting sprinkler and SDI irrigation of corn was conducted in 2013 on four conjoined 4.4-ha fields, each containing a large weighing lysimeter for energy and water balance measurements. Two fields were sprinkler irrigated and two had SDI. The study was conducted on a Pullman silty clay loam (fine, mixed, superactive, thermic Torrertic Paleustoll) at Bushland, TX (35°11' N, 102°6' W, 1174 m above MSL). Fields were fertilized for a 16.7 Mg per ha (250 bushel per acre) yield goal, and irrigated to replace crop water use to field capacity on a weekly basis. Weather was measured at an adjacent research weather station over mowed grass. AquaCrop was run using soil-specific hydraulic and physical properties, the recorded and quality controlled weather data, and input data on plant stand and fertilization. The presentation will discuss the differences between field-measured crop water use and water use efficiency and those estimated using AquaCrop, including whether or not AquaCrop was able to estimate the 1.57 Mg per ha (25 bushel per acre) yield advantage achieved using SDI.