Location: Agricultural Systems ResearchTitle: Models Robustness for Simulating Drainage and NO3-N Fluxes) Author
|Jabro, Jalal "jay"|
Submitted to: Geophysical Research Abstracts
Publication Type: Abstract only
Publication Acceptance Date: 2/14/2013
Publication Date: 4/2/2013
Citation: Jabro, J.D., Jabro, A.D. 2013. Models Robustness for Simulating Drainage and NO3-N Fluxes. Geophysical Research Abstracts. Vol. 15, EGU2013-115-1. Interpretive Summary:
Technical Abstract: Computer models simulate and forecast appropriate agricultural practices to reduce environmental impact. The objectives of this study were to assess and compare robustness and performance ofhree models – LEACHM, NCSWAP, and SOIL-SOILN–for simulating drainage and NO3-N leaching fluxes in an intense pasture system without recalibration. A 3-yr study was conducted on a Hagerstown silt loam to measure drainage and NO3-N fluxes below 1 m depth from N-fertilized orchardgrass using intact core lysimeters. Five N-fertilizer treatments were replicated five times in a randomized complete block experimental design. The models were validated under orchardgrass using soil, water and N transformation rate parameters and C pools fractionation derived from a previous study conducted on similar soils under corn. The model efficiency (MEF) of drainage and NO3-N fluxes were 0.53, 0.69 for LEACHM; 0.75, 0.39 for NCSWAP; and 0.94, 0.91for SOIL-SOILN. The models failed to produce reasonable simulations of drainage and NO3-N fluxes in January, February and March due to limited water movement associated with frozen soil and snow accumulation and melt. The differences between simulated and measured NO3-N leaching and among models’ performances may also be related to soil N and C transformation processes embedded in the models These results are a monumental progression in the validation of computer models which will lead to continued diffusion across diverse stakeholders.