Page Banner

United States Department of Agriculture

Agricultural Research Service

Research Project: OBJECT MODELING AND SCALING OF LANDSCAPE PROCESSES AND CONSERVATION EFFECTS IN AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS

Location: Location not imported yet.

Title: An analytical framework to assist decision makers in the use of forest ecosystem model predictions)

Author
item Larocque, Guy
item Bhatti, Jagtar
item Ascough, James
item Liu, Jinxun
item Luckai, Nancy
item Mailly, Daniel
item Archambault, Louis
item Gordon, Andrew

Submitted to: Journal of Environmental Modeling and Software
Publication Type: Peer Reviewed Journal
Publication Acceptance Date: 2/26/2010
Publication Date: 3/1/2011
Citation: Larocque, G.R., Bhatti, J.S., Ascough II, J.C., Liu, J., Luckai, N., Mailly, D., Archambault, L., Gordon, A.M. 2011. An analytical framework to assist decision makers in the use of forest ecosystem model predictions. Journal of Environmental Modeling and Software. 26(3):280-288.

Interpretive Summary: The predictions of most terrestrial ecosystem models originate from deterministic simulations. Relatively few uncertainty evaluation exercises in model outputs are performed by either model developers or users. This issue has important consequences for decision makers who rely on models to develop natural resource management policies, as they cannot evaluate the extent to which predictions stemming from the simulation of different management scenarios may result in significant environmental or economical differences. Different analytical methods, such as sensitivity, uncertainty analyses or bootstrap methods, can be used to evaluate models and the errors associated with their outputs. However, there are difficulties with the application of these methods and decision makers do not necessarily know how to deal with the outputs generated from them. In this paper, a decision flow chart is proposed to help decision makers apply, in an orderly manner, the different steps involved in examining the model outputs. The analytical framework is discussed with regards to the definition of the problems and objectives, model selection, identification of alternatives, modelling tasks and the selection of alternatives for developing policy or implement management scenarios. Its application is illustrated using an on-going exercise conducted in Ontario, Canada, to develop silvicultural guidelines for the forest management enterprise.

Technical Abstract: The predictions of most terrestrial ecosystem models originate from deterministic simulations. Relatively few uncertainty evaluation exercises in model outputs are performed by either model developers or users. This issue has important consequences for decision makers who rely on models to develop natural resource management policies, as they cannot evaluate the extent to which predictions stemming from the simulation of different management scenarios may result in significant environmental or economical differences. Different analytical methods, such as sensitivity, uncertainty analyses or bootstrap methods, can be used to evaluate models and the errors associated with their outputs. However, there are difficulties with the application of these methods and decision makers do not necessarily know how to deal with the outputs generated from them. In this paper, a decision flow chart is proposed to help decision makers apply, in an orderly manner, the different steps involved in examining the model outputs. The analytical framework is discussed with regards to the definition of the problems and objectives, model selection, identification of alternatives, modelling tasks and the selection of alternatives for developing policy or implement management scenarios. Its application is illustrated using an on-going exercise conducted in Ontario, Canada, to develop silvicultural guidelines for the forest management enterprise.

Last Modified: 8/24/2016
Footer Content Back to Top of Page