|Webber, Charles - Chuck|
Submitted to: Oklahoma Agriculture Experiment Station Departmental Publication
Publication Type: Experiment Station
Publication Acceptance Date: 5/15/2006
Publication Date: 6/1/2006
Citation: Webber III, C.L., Shrefler, J.W. 2006. Corn gluten meal application equipment: Formulations, rates, and banding evaluations. 2005 Vegetable Trial Report, Oklahoma State University, Division of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Department of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture. Stillwater, OK. MP-164, p. 54-56. Interpretive Summary:
Technical Abstract: Previous research has determined that corn gluten meal (CGM) produces an inhibitory effect and reduces root formation in several weed species. One limitation to further evaluation of CGM in field vegetable production is the difficulty in achieving a uniform application to the soil surface. The use of equipment to mechanically apply CGM would avoid the difficulty involved with manual application of CGM. Suitable equipment would also enable evaluation of the potential benefits of banded applications for weed control efficacy and crop safety of direct seeded vegetables. The objective of this research was to develop and test equipment that would permit either solid (broadcast) or banded application of corn gluten meal to a field. An applicator was assembled using various machinery components for the purpose of uniformly applying corn gluten meal to the soil surface in either a solid (broadcast) or banded pattern. Field evaluations were conducted during the 2004 and 2005 growing seasons on 32-inch wide raised beds at Lane, OK. The equipment was evaluated using two CGM formulations (powdered and granulated), three application rates (5, 10, and 15 lb/100 ft**2), and two application configurations (solid and banded). Tractor speed was varied to achieve the desired application rates within formulation and application configurations. Differences between CGM formulations affected the flow rate within each application configuration and between application configurations. The granulated formulation flowed at a faster rate than the powdered formulation, and the banded configuration flowed faster than the solid application. It was determined that the CGM powder used with the solid application configuration was inconsistent and unreliable and thus not feasible for use with the same equipment without further modification. Field evaluations determined that the equipment setup with the CGM granulated formulation resulted in the most reliable and precise delivery of the three application rates (5, 10, and 15 lb/100 ft**2) for both application configurations compared to the powdered CGM formulation applied in the banded configuration. These evaluations demonstrated the feasibility of using equipment, rather than manual applications, to apply corn gluten meal to raised beds for organic weed control purposes. A number of equipment alterations will increase the efficiency and potential usefulness of mechanical applications of corn gluten meal. Future equipment developments and evaluations should focus on increasing the application rate to decrease the time to apply corn gluten meal to a field.