Skip to main content
ARS Home » Research » Publications at this Location » Publication #194802
Title: ATTITUDES AND BELIEFS EFFECT FREQUENCY OF EATING OUT IN THE LOWER MISSISSIPPI DELTA

Author
item MCGEE, BERNESTINE - SOUTHERN UNIV & A&M COLL
item GOSSETT, JEFF - ACHRI/DAC
item SIMPSON, PIPPA - ACHRI/DAC
item Bogle, Margaret
item JOHNSON, GLENDA - SOUTHERN UNIV & A&M COLL
item BARDELL, KIMBERLY - SOUTHERN UNIV & A&M COLL
item KIM, KAREN - UAMS COLLEGE PUB HEALTH
item RICHARDSON, VALERIE - SOUTHERN UNIV & A&M COLL
item THORNTON, ALMA - SOUTHERN UNIV & A&M COLL
item JOHNSON, CRYSTAL - SOUTHERN UNIV & A&M COLL

Submitted to: Journal of Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology
Publication Type: Abstract Only
Publication Acceptance Date: 1/20/2006
Publication Date: 3/6/2006
Citation: McGee, B.B., Gossett, J.M., Simpson, P.M., Bogle, M.L., Johnson, G.S., Bardell, K., Kim, K., Richardson, V., Thornton, A., Johnson, C. 2006. Attitudes and beliefs effect frequency of eating out in the Lower Mississippi Delta [abstract]. Journal of Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology. 20(4):A552.

Interpretive Summary:

Technical Abstract: Attitudes and beliefs reflecting cultural values can have a positive or negative influence on eating behaviors. Eating out may negatively affect diet quality. In a representative sample of the Lower Mississippi Delta (LMD) consisting of 1601 African American (AA) and Caucasian (C) adults, the aim was to show that the frequency of eating out was lower in those that had a better attitudes to diet in addition to cultural and socioeconomic differences. A comparison was made of those who thought it was important to practice five healthy eating guidelines to those who thought it did not think it was important. The study found that those who thought it was important to eat plenty of fruits and vegetables (P<0.001), consume adequate fiber (P<0.005), and eat 2 servings of dairy daily (P<0.05) eat out less often. Using regression modeling with frequency as the outcome, religiosity, income, education, gender, food security, knowledge, and age as independents, it was shown that all but religiosity, food security, and education were significant. Being younger, white, or male or having a lower income or better attitude resulted in eating out less. Previous finds showed that diet is poorer in those with lower income and education, and in food insecure households. This suggests that it is not just how often people eat out but where they eat out. Sensitivity to the beliefs and attitudes is important when planning effective nutrition interventions.