Skip to main content
ARS Home » Southeast Area » Auburn, Alabama » Soil Dynamics Research » Research » Publications at this Location » Publication #194560
Title: EVALUATION OF FRESHLY CHIPPED PINE TREE SUBSTRATE FOR CONTAINER-GROWN LANTANA CAMERA

Author
item BOYER, CHERYL - AUBURN UNIVERSITY
item Fain, Glenn
item GILLIAM, CHARLES - AUBURN UNIVERSITY
item Torbert, Henry - Allen
item GALLAGHER, THOMAS - AUBURN UNIVERSITY
item SIBLEY, JEFF - AUBURN UNIVERSITY

Submitted to: American Society of Horticulture Science Meeting
Publication Type: Abstract Only
Publication Acceptance Date: 4/15/2006
Publication Date: 7/1/2006
Citation: Boyer, C.R., Fain, G.B., Gilliam, C.H., Torbert III, H.A., Gallagher, T.V., Sibley, J.L. 2006. Evaluation of freshly chipped pine tree substrate for container-grown lantana camera. HortScience. 41(4):1027.

Interpretive Summary:

Technical Abstract: A study was conducted at Auburn University to evaluate freshly chipped pine trees as an alternative substrate in container nursery crops. Two substrates were tested alone and in combination with aged pine bark (PB), peat (P), and composted poultry litter (PL). A 6:1 (v:v) PB:sand control treatment was also included. The two substrates were both composed of small caliper (2 to 10 cm) Pinus taeda processed in a chipper (including needles) (AUC); however, one substrate was additionally processed through a hammermill with a 0.95-cm screen (AUHM). Treatments included were 100% AUC, 3:1 (v/v) AUC:PB, 3:1 (v/v) AUC:P, 3:1 (v/v) AUC:PL, 1:1 (v/v) AUC:PB, 1:1 (v/v) AUC:P, 1:1 (v/v) AUC:PL, and the same treatments for the AUHM substrate. There were a total of 15 treatments with six replications per treatment. Each substrate was amended with 0.45 kg•m-3 gypsum, 6.35 kg•m-3 Polyon 17–6–12 (17N–2.6P–10K) and 0.68 kg•m-3 MicroMax. Trade gallon (2.8-L) containers were filled with respective substrates and planted with Lantana camera ‘New Gold’ on 20 July 2005. AUC and AUHM treatments amended with either PL or P resulted in Lantana with growth indices similar to PB:sand (6:1). In general, plants tended to be larger when amended on a 1:1 basis with either PL or P, but were similar statistically to those amended 3:1. For example, plants grown with AUHM:P 1:1 or AUHM:PL 1:1 were 7.3% and 8.8% larger, respectively, than plants grown in the same medium at 3:1. The lowest growth indices tended to occur with AUC and AUHM alone or amended with pine bark. Lantana root growth followed a similar trend to growth indices in that greatest coverage of the rootball surface occurred with AUC or AUHM treatments amended with PL or P.