Skip to main content
ARS Home » Plains Area » Bushland, Texas » Conservation and Production Research Laboratory » Soil and Water Management Research » Research » Publications at this Location » Publication #184330


item Gowda, Prasanna

Submitted to: American Agricultural Economics Association Meeting
Publication Type: Other
Publication Acceptance Date: 7/1/2005
Publication Date: 7/1/2005
Citation: Petrolia, D., Gowda, P., Mulla, D.J. 2005. Agricultural drainage and gulf hypoxia: economic targeting of farmland to reduce nitrogen loads in a Minnesota watershed. American Agricultural Economics Association Meeting, July 24-27, 2005, Providence, Rhode Island. p. 1-21.

Interpretive Summary: Hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico is a serious environmental issue which has been attributed primarily to nitrogen enriched waters entering the Gulf from the Mississippi River. The Mississippi River/Gulf of Mexico Watershed Nutrient Task Force set a coastal goal of reducing areal extent of hypoxia in the Gulf to 5,000 sq. km. by 2015. They estimated that this would require a 30 percent reduction in nitrogen discharges from the Mississippi and Atchafalaya Rivers to the Gulf. In this study, simulated results from a biophysical model was combined with a linear-optimization model to evaluate environmental and economic impact of alternative land use policies with explicit focus on subsurface tile drainage, one of the major pathways for nitrogen losses from agricultural watersheds in the Upper Midwest U.S. Results indicate that although tile drained land is a major source of nitrogen, it is better to focus retirement policies on relatively less productive, no-drained acres.

Technical Abstract: Agricultural nitrogen losses are the major contributor to nitrogen loads in the Mississippi River, and consequently, to the existence of hypoxic, or "dead", zone in the Gulf of Mexico. Focusing on two small agricultural watersheds in southeast Minnesota, simulation results from the Agricultural Drainage and Pesticide Transport (ADAPT) model were combined with a linear-optimization model to evaluate the environmental and economic impact of alternative land-use policies for reducing nitrogen losses. Of particular importance was the study's explicit focus on agricultural subsurface (tile) drainage, which has been identified as the major pathway for agricultural nitrogen losses in the upper Midwest, and the use of drainage-focused abatement policies. Results indicate that tile-drained land plays a key role in nitrogen abatement, and that a combined policy of nutrient management on tile-drained land and retirement of non-drained land is a cost-effective means of achieving a 20- or 30-percent nitrogen-abatement goal. Results also indicate that although it is cost-effective to abate on tile-drained land, it is not cost-effective to undertake policies that plug or remove tile drains from the landscape, regardless of whether the land would be retired or kept in production. Therefore, results imply that although tile-drained land is a major source of nitrogen lost to waterways, it is not cost-effective to remove the drainage from the land. Because of its value to agricultural production, it is better to keep tile-drained land in production under nutrient management and focus retirement policies on relatively less-productive, non-drained acres.