Page Banner

United States Department of Agriculture

Agricultural Research Service

Related Topics

Research Project: ECOLOGY, MANAGEMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF WEEDY AND INVASIVE PLANT SPECIES IN A CHANGING CLIMATE

Location: Global Change and Photosynthesis Research

2012 Annual Report


1a. Objectives (from AD-416):
Objective 1: Measure effects of management, climate, and soil conditions on microbial processes (herbicide degradation, nitrogen cycling, and weed seedbank dynamics) in corn/soybean ecosystems. Objective 2: Evaluate the effects of management and climate change on the biology and ecology of weedy and invasive species, including potential weedy cellulosic bioenergy crops, in Midwestern cropping systems. Objective 3: Identify effective combinations of weed management components through application of both new and existing knowledge that exploit useful plant and environmental interactions in vegetable cropping systems.


1b. Approach (from AD-416):
Each objective of the proposed work seeks to advance knowledge of specific topics that directly or indirectly relate to weed-crop competition for resources, providing a basis to identify tactics of routine management that shift the competitive advantage to the crop. We examine the ecology of microorganisms and plants, and combine these efforts into a synthesis that applies research findings toward practical solutions. Each objective utilizes the whole scientific team, and regardless of scale, experiments include samples from a common group of sites, providing extensive metadata support. Studies under Objective 1 address microbial activities that are influenced by agricultural management, climate, or soil conditions. Primary climatic factors to be addressed are temperature and rainfall. In Objective 2, management and climate change will be evaluated as to effects on the biology and ecology of weedy and invasive species, including potential weedy cellulosic bio-energy crops, in Midwestern cropping systems. A particular focus will be on spatiotemporal variation in demographic parameters and population growth rates at multiple levels of scale. As a means of unifying observations, whole life cycles of weeds will be the unit of study whenever possible. Objective 3 identifies effective combinations of weed management components through application of both new and existing knowledge that exploit useful plant and environmental interactions in vegetable cropping systems.


3. Progress Report:
Degradation of the herbicide, metolachlor, in flooded soil exhibited biphasic degradation with significantly faster degradation occurring when soil microorganisms began using iron for respiration. This resulted in irreversible binding of the metolachlor residues to soil. We observed similar results with the herbicide, trifluralin in previous reports. These results suggest that the predicted increased frequency of transient flooding in the Midwest may affect the function of soil applied herbicides. We increased seed, under carefully controlled field conditions, of accessions of Palmer amaranth collected from throughout the southern U.S. for use in common garden competition experiments. Special care was taken to avoid introducing a seedbank for these species. We also monitored and measured the demography and growth of the energy crops Miscanthus giganteus and Miscanthus sinensis in old field and forest environments in central Illinois, again with special procedures to minimize invasion risk. Finally, we continued our work on the management and environmental risk factors associated with the evolution and spread of glyphosate resistant waterhemp in Illinois grain crops, beginning database construction and statistical analysis. Several experiments concerning weed management in sweet corn were conducted. Organic weed management systems in Illinois and Washington were examined, whereby combinations of competitive crop cultivars and mechanical weed management tactics were tested. In other work, integrated weed management alternatives to atrazine– the most widely used herbicide in corn production – were tested in Illinois and Minnesota. Finally, we quantified the extent to which climate region (Midwest versus Pacific Northwest), cytochrome P450 genotype in sweet corn, and herbicide tankmix influenced crop tolerance to HPPD-inhibiting herbicides. Processing pumpkin productivity and weed community characteristics also are being quantified in different production systems, including a bioenergy-vegetable double-cropping system. Biomass feedstock (rye+vetch) was fall-planted and spring-seeded; processing pumpkin is grown in different tillage and residue treatments. We have been successful in cultivating processing pumpkin, which has required some new field equipment and an aggressive fungicide application schedule. At the request of vegetable industry stakeholders, new agronomic and weed management research in vegetable soybean (edamame) is underway. One set of experiments is being used to quantify the shortcomings of current weed management systems built around the small number of herbicides being considered for use in the crop. Another set of experiments has been deployed to characterize important agronomic traits, including disease susceptibility, herbicide sensitivity, and weed suppressive traits, among new and old commercial and public cultivars.


4. Accomplishments


Review Publications
Pataky, J.K., Williams, M., Headrick, M.M., Nankam, C., Du Toit, L., Michener, P.M. 2011. Observations from a quarter century of evaluating reactions of sweet corn hybrids in disease nurseries. Plant Disease. 95:1492-1506.

Williams, M.M. II, Pataky, J.K. 2011. Interactions between maize dwarf mosaic and weed interference on sweet corn. Field Crops Research. 128:48-54.

Williams, M., Boydston, R.A., Peachey, R.E., Robinson, D. 2011. Significance of atrazine as a tank-mix partner with tembotrione. Weed Technology. 25(3):299-302.

Bicksler, A., Masiunas, J., Davis, A.S. 2012. Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) suppession by sudangrass interference and defoliation. Weed Science. 60:260-266.

Davidson, A.N., Ho, C., Chee Sanford, J.C., Lai, H.Y., Klenzendorf, J.B., Kirisits, M.J. 2011. Characterization of bromate-reducing bacterial isolates and their potential for drinking water treatment. Water Research. 45(18):6051-6062.

Williams, M.M. II. 2011. Agronomics and economics of plant population density on processing sweet corn. Field Crops Research. 128:55-61.

Davis, A.S., Landis, D.A. 2011. Invasive species in agriculture. In: M. Rejmanek and D. Simberloff, editors. Encyclopedia of Introduced Invasive Species. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. p. 7-11.

Davis, A.S., Daedlow, D., Schutte, B.J., Westerman, P. 2011. Temporal scaling of episodic point estimates of weed seed predation to long-term predation rates. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 2:382-692.

Matlaga, D.P., Quinn, L.D., Davis, A.S., Stewart, R. 2012. Light response of native and introduced Miscanthus sinensis seedlings. Biological Invasions. 5:363-374.

Evans, J.A., Davis, A.S., Raghu, S., Raghavendran, A., Landis, D., Schemske, D. 2012. The importance of space, time and stochasticity to the demography and management of Alliaria petiolata. Ecological Applications. 22:1497-1511.

Davis, A.S., Ainsworth, E.A. 2012. Weed interference with field-grown soybean (Glycine max) decreases under elevated [CO2] in a FACE experiment. Weed Research. 52(3):277-285.

Matlaga, D.P., Schutte, B., Davis, A.S. 2012. Age-dependent population dynamics of the bioenergy crop Miscanthus x giganteus in Illinois. Journal of Invasive Plant Science and Management. 5:238-248.

Sims, G.K., Kanissery, R. 2012. Transformation of herbicides under transient anoxia. In: Casteneda, S.F., Emerson, M.L., editors. Xenobiotics: New Research. Hauppauge, New York: Nova Science Publishers. p. 67-84.

Last Modified: 10/19/2017
Footer Content Back to Top of Page