Cereal Crops Research Site Logo
ARS Home About Us Helptop nav spacerContact Us En Espanoltop nav spacer
Printable VersionPrintable Version     E-mail this pageE-mail this page
Agricultural Research Service United States Department of Agriculture
Search
  Advanced Search
 
Programs and Projects
Subjects of Investigation
Barley and Malt Analysis
Barley Final QA (Quality Analysis) Tables
Year 2011 Barley Reports
Year 2010 Barley Reports
Year 2009 Barley Reports
Year 2008 Barley Reports
Year 2007 Barley Reports
Year 2006 Barley Reports
 

Title: ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF MOLECULAR MARKER ASSISTED SELECTION FOR MALTING QUALITY TRAITS IN BARLEY

Authors
item Han, F - WASHINGTON STATE UNIV.
item Romagosa, I - UNIV. LEIDA--SPAIN
item Ullrich, S - WASHINGTON STATE UNIV.
item Jones, Berne
item Hayes, P - OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY
item Wesenberg, Darrell

Submitted to: Book Chapter
Publication Type: Book / Chapter
Publication Acceptance Date: December 7, 1997
Publication Date: N/A

Technical Abstract: Direct selection for malting quality in breeding programs is resource- intensive. More efficient approaches for identifying genotypes with good malting quality are highly desirable. The flanking markers, Brz and Amy2, and WG622 and BCD402B, for two major quantitative trait loci (QTL) regions for malt extract percentage, a-amylase activity, diastatic power, and malt b-glucan content on chromosome 1 (QTL1) and 4 (QTL2) were used for marker assisted selection (MAS) (Ullrich et al. 1997; Han et al. 1997). MAS was carried out in a population consisting of 92 doubled haploid lines derived from the "Steptoe" x "Morex" cross, which were not used in the original mapping efforts. Four alternative selection strategies: (1) phenotypic selection, (2) genotypic selection, (3) tandem genotypic and phenotypic selection, and (4) combined phenotypic and genotypic selection for malting quality. MAS for QTL1 (tandem genotypic and phenotypic selection, and combined phenotypic and genotypic selection) was more effective than phenotypic selection, but MAS for QTL2 was not as effective as phenotypic selection due to a lack of QTL2 effect in the selection population. Tandem genotypic and phenotypic selection makes MAS practical, for traits which are difficult or expensive to measure, such as most malting quality traits. MAS can substantially eliminate poor genotypes by early genotyping and keeping only desirable genotypes for later phenotypic selection.

   
 
 
Last Modified: 05/24/2013
ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links 
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House