Hometop nav spacerAbout ARStop nav spacerHelptop nav spacerContact Ustop nav spacerEn Espanoltop nav spacer
Printable VersionPrintable Version     E-mail this pageE-mail this page
United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service
Search
 
 
 
National Programs
International Programs
Find Research Projects
The Research Enterprise
Office of Scientific Quality Review
Research Initiatives
 

Title: COMPARING TWO METHODS FOR ESTIMATING FIELD SOLUTE TRANSPORT PROPERTIES

Authors
item Casey, Francis - IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY
item Logsdon, Sally
item Horton, Robert - IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY
item Jaynes, Dan

Submitted to: Agronomy Abstracts
Publication Type: Abstract Only
Publication Acceptance Date: October 31, 1997
Publication Date: N/A

Technical Abstract: Two techniques that estimate field soil immobile water content (Theta im) and mass exchange coefficient (Alpha) have been compared. Both methods use the tension infiltrometer to apply nonsorbing anionic tracers to the soil surface. The first method uses a single tracer application and the second method applies a sequence of tracers. Five measurement positions in a Nicollet series soil (Fine-loamy, mixed, mesic Aquic Hapludoll) were chosen within a ridge tilled corn (Zea mays) field. The sequential tracer method gave immobile water fraction (Theta im/Theta) values that ranged from 0.45 to 0.98 and Alpha values ranging from 0.01 to 0.13 d-1, while the single tracer method gave (Theta im/Theta) values ranging from 0.03 to 0.16 and Alpha values ranging from 0.15 to 1.45 d-1. The estimated values for (Theta im/Theta) were less variable within a measurement area for the sequential tracer method than for the single tracer method. For a number of replications, the sequential tracer technique produced consistent values for Alpha at a single time, while the single tracer method produced highly variable Alpha values over a period of time.

   
 
 
Last Modified: 05/25/2013
ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links 
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House