Vegetable Research Site Logo
ARS Home About Us Helptop nav spacerContact Us En Espanoltop nav spacer
Printable VersionPrintable Version     E-mail this pageE-mail this page
Agricultural Research Service United States Department of Agriculture
Search
  Advanced Search
 
Programs and Projects
Subjects of Investigation
 

Title: COMPARISON OF PRE-PLANT FUMIGATION WITH METHYL BROMIDE AND DIFFERING LEVELSOF HOST PLANT RESISTANCE FOR MANAGING SOUTHERN ROOT-KNOT NEMATODES IN PEPPER

Authors

Submitted to: Proceedings of International Research Conference on Methyl Bromide Alternatives
Publication Type: Abstract Only
Publication Acceptance Date: November 4, 1996
Publication Date: N/A

Technical Abstract: A field study was conducted to compare pre-plant soil fumigation with methyl bromide and host plant resistance for controlling southern root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne incognita) in pepper plantings. The study was conducted in a field that had been artificially infested with M. incognita race 3. The experimental design was a split-plot with six replications. The main plots were fumigated with methyl bromide [98% CH3Br:2%CCl3NO2 (w/w)] and non-fumigated; sub-plots were the cultivars Carolina Cayenne (resistant), Keystone Resistant Giant (intermediate), and California Wonder (susceptible). Methyl bromide gave a high level of nematode control in all fumigated plots. Carolina Cayenne was highly resistant in the non-fumigated plots, i.e., root galling and nematode reproduction (4,300 eggs/g fresh root) were minimal, and fruit yields were not reduced. Keystone Resistant Giant was moderately resistant in the non-fumigated plots, i.e., root galling and nematode reproduction (26,500 eggs/g fresh root) were intermediate between Carolina Cayenne and California Wonder, and fruit yields were not reduced, suggesting that Keystone Resistant Giant may be relatively tolerant to M. incognita. California Wonder plants in the non-fumigated plots were susceptible, i.e., severe root galling and high nematode reproduction (48,600 eggs/g fresh root), and fruit yields were significantly reduced.

   
 
 
Last Modified: 05/25/2013
ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links 
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House