Location: Range Management Research
Title: Rotational grazing systems and livestock grazing behavior in shrub-dominated semi-arid and arid rangelands Authors
|Bailey, Derek -|
|Brown, Joel -|
Submitted to: Rangeland Ecology and Management
Publication Type: Peer Reviewed Journal
Publication Acceptance Date: September 18, 2010
Publication Date: January 15, 2011
Citation: Bailey, D.W., Brown, J.R. 2011. Rotational grazing systems and livestock grazng behavior in shrub-dominated semi-arid and arid rangelands. Rangeland Ecology and Management. 64:1-9. Interpretive Summary: There is little support for the assertion that grazing management can change livestock selection in arid and semi-arid rangelands. The multiple constraints of low productivity, variable topography and plant diversity limit a manager's ability to change animal behavior. Managerial efforts should focus on adjusting stocking rates and improving distribution at the paddock scale rather than attempting to change fine scale forage selection preferences.
Technical Abstract: Rotational grazing systems (RGS) are often implemented to alleviate undesirable selective grazing by livestock. At both fine and coarse scales, livestock selectively graze individual plants, patches, communities, and landscapes. Smaller pastures, increased stocking density, and rotation allow managers to constrain livestock movement and determine season and frequency of grazing, potentially limiting selectivity and preventing repeated grazing of preferred plants. However, in arid and semi-arid rangelands, forage growth is limited primarily by precipitation rather than defoliation frequency. When soil moisture is adequate, forage is abundant and defoliation levels are typically low, and repeated, intensive defoliation of preferred plants is less likely than in more mesic areas where more consistent precipitation and soil moisture storage allows animals to establish and maintain spatial hierarchies of grazing patterns. Many southwestern rangelands contain diverse vegetation, which provides quality forage during different times of the year. These spatial and temporal patterns of forage distribution may not be amenable to manipulation with RGS. Tracking data show that livestock often alternate among locations within pasture boundaries and can opportunistically exploit areas with higher quality forage when they are available. Higher stock densities combined with higher stocking rates can increase livestock use of less preferred areas, but overall distribution patterns of intensive-rotational and extensive grazing systems are often comparable at similar stocking rates and distances from water. Management that ensures that grazing of riparian areas does not occur during the critical late summer period may be more beneficial than RGS that periodically defers livestock use throughout the grazing season. In arid and semi-arid shrublands, timely adjustments to animal numbers and practices that improve grazing distribution at regional and landscape scales are more likely to be effective in maintaining or improving rangeland health than fencing and RGS.