Watershed Physical Processes Research Unit Site Logo
ARS Home About Us Helptop nav spacerContact Us En Espanoltop nav spacer
Printable VersionPrintable Version     E-mail this pageE-mail this page
Agricultural Research Service United States Department of Agriculture
Search
  Advanced Search
 
Programs and Projects
Subjects of Investigation
Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation 2 - Changes in 2010
Test
 

Research Project: TECHNOLOGIES FOR MANAGING WATER AND SEDIMENT MOVEMENT IN AGRICULTURAL WATERSHEDS

Location: Watershed Physical Processes Research Unit

Title: The role of soil surface water regimes and raindrop impact on hillslope soil erosion and nutrient losses

Authors
item An, Juan -
item Zheng, Fenli -
item Romkens, Mathias
item Li, Guifang -
item Yang, Qingsen -
item Wen, Leilei -
item Wang, Bin -

Submitted to: Natural Hazards
Publication Type: Peer Reviewed Journal
Publication Acceptance Date: January 18, 2013
Publication Date: March 14, 2013
Citation: An, J., Zheng, F., Romkens, M.J., Li, G., Yang, Q., Wen, L., Wang, B. 2013. The role of soil surface water regimes and raindrop impact on hillslope soil erosion and nutrient losses. Natural Hazards. DOI 10.1007/s11069-013-0570-9. 67:411-430.

Interpretive Summary: Soil and nutrient loss from agricultural land are most often considered from a scale in which soils, crops, topography, and rainfall are uniform. In reality, and depending on scale, conditions relative to these characteristics and situations vary substantially. On sloping land the surface water regime changes appreciably from top to bottom of fields with zones of standing and flowing water, positive (seepage) and negative (infiltration) surface soil water pressures. These different hydraulic surface conditions affect soil and nutrient movement differently. In this article, the results of a rainfall simulator study are discussed in which the effect of different commonly observed hydraulic surface conditions on soil and nutrient movement were simulated. These were: (1) a free-drainage soil profile with rainfall (FD+R), (2) a saturated soil water profile with rainfall (SA+R), (3) artesian seepage under a 20 cm soil water pressure without rainfall (SP), and (4) seepage under 20 cm water pressure with rainfall (SP+20). Also, two surface conditions were considered: (1) a sealed or crusted surface (exposed soil surface), and (2) a seal- or crust-free surface (protected surface). The results showed: (1) eroded soil was enriched in nutrients relative to that of the original soil; (2) nutrient concentrations and losses varied little with a change in the soil/water regime but tended to follow the sequence SP+R > SA+R > FD+R; (3) raindrop impact was more appreciable on nutrient loss with soil than with runoff; and (4) the effect of raindrop impact on the covered plot reduced soil loss by 57%-74%. This information will be helpful for better management practices involving deep tillage and no-till on the slopes of the Black Soil Region n China.

Technical Abstract: Soil surface water regimes on hill-slopes may appreciably affect soil erosion and nutrient losses. Different water regimes are often prevalent on different parts of the slope and therefore may affect these losses differently. A laboratory rainfall simulator study was conducted to determine the effect of the slope surface water regime on soil erosion, nitrogen (N), and phosphorus (P) losses by runoff on a silty clay loam soil of the Black Soil Region in Northeast China. Four soil surface water regimes were studied: a freely draining soil profile with rainfall (FD+R), a saturated soil water profile with rainfall (Sa+R), artesian induced seepage under 20 cm of soil water pressure without rain (SP20), and seepage under 20 cm of soil water pressure with rainfall. Also, two surface treatments were included–one with and the other without a nylon net surface cover to study the effect of rain drop impact. Nitrogen was applied at a rate of 200 kg/ha and phosphorus at a rate of 90kg/ha. Sixty mm of rainfall was applied at an intensity of 60 mm/h on a 5° slope. Results show that the surface water regime appreciable affected soil erosion and nutrient loss. Runoff from the SP20+R and Sa+R treatments were, respectively, 1.79-1.99 and 1.53-1.81 times greater than that from the FD+R treatment while soil losses were, respectively, 1.50-1.74 and 1.12-1.74 times greater. Nutrient concentrations and losses in runoff followed the sequence SP+R >Sa+R >FD+R. Seepage flow was relatively low and caused little soil loss, but contained appreciable amounts of nutrients. NOsub3-N, NHsub4-N, and POsub4-P concentrations in runoff from the SP20 treatment were respectively, 200x, 40x, and 7.3x that of the FD+R treatment. The eroded soil content in runoff from the FD+R, Sa+R, and SP+R treatments ranged from 48.6-76.5, 58.6-80.6, and 55.4-140.6 mg/l, respectively, for NOsub3-N, 13.8-18.2, and 14.5-48.4 mg/l for NHsub4-N, and 0.40-1.87, 1.81-3.03, and 2.30-2.47 mg/l for POsub4-P, respectively. Although the eroded soil was enriched in nutrients relative to that of the original soil, nutrient concentrations and losses varied little with a change in the soil water regime. Raindrop impact on the nylon net cover reduced soil loss by 57%-74%. Mineral N and P losses reduced about 15% and 21%. Effects of rain drop impact were more appreciable on nutrient loss with soil than in runoff. These findings are expected to lead to better soil management practices involving deep tillage and no-till on hill slopes of the Black Soil Region in Northeast China.

   

 
Project Team
Kuhnle, Roger
Dabney, Seth
Wells, Robert - Rob
Wilson, Glenn
Rigby, James - Jr
Wren, Daniel
Romkens, Mathias - Matt
Bonta, James - Jim
Langendoen, Eddy
Bingner, Ronald - Ron
 
Publications
   Publications
 
Related National Programs
  Water Availability and Water Management (211)
  Climate Change, Soils, and Emissions (212)
  Bioenergy (213)
 
Related Projects
   ASSESSMENT OF EPHEMERAL GULLY EROSION PROCESSES
   CHARACTERIZATION AND SIMULATION OF CHANNEL ADJUSTMENTS IN RESERVOIR DEPOSITS FOLLOWING DAM REMOVAL
   Enhancement of the Channel Evolution Model CONCEPTS for Predicting Water Quality Benefits of Rretention of Riverine Sediments by Floodplains
   CUMULATIVE IMPACTS/EFFECTS OF PLANNED BANK STABILIZATION ALONG THE BIG SIOUX RIVER AND SKUNK CREEK, SOUTH DAKOTA
   UPDATING NRCS TECHNICAL RELEASE #56 WITH FLOATING WAVE BARRIER GUIDANCE
   REVISED UNIVERSAL SOIL LOSS EQUATION, VERSION 2 (RUSLE2) ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT
   DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF SCIENTIFIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR RUSLE2
   CONSERVATION EFFECTS ASSESSMENT PROJECT (CEAP) (2011) - ARS BENCHMARK WATERSHED STUDIES
   CONSERVATION EFFECTS ASSESSMENT PROJECT (CEAP) (2011) - ARS BENCHMARK WATERSHED STUDIES
   Maxium Sediment Capacity of Saltating Sediment Size Mixtures
   PROGRAMMERS GUIDE TO THE RUSLE2 SOURCE CODE
   UPDATING NRCS TECHNICAL RELEASE #56 WITH FLOATING WAVE BARRIER GUIDANCE
   SUPPORT OF THE REVISED UNIVERSAL SOIL LOSS EQUATION, VERSION 2 (RUSLE2)
   DATA BASE DEVELOPMENT FOR NORTH APPALACHIAN EXPERIMENTAL WATERSHED (NAEW) DATA
   Quantifying the Spatial Location of Small-scale Land Management Changes in Large Watersheds Using Hydrological Modeling
   MORE EFFICIENT SCIENCE CALCULATION OF THE REVISED UNIVERSAL SOIL LOSS EQUATION, VERSION 2 (RUSLE2)
   GEOSPATIAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH FOR CHARACTERIZATION OF WATERSHED PROCESSES AT MULTIPLE SCALES
   Geospatial information research for improved watershed management practice assessments in the USA and China
   Advancement of Erosion Modeling and Precision Conservation Planning to Target Ephemeral Gully Control in the Lower South Fork Watershed
   Conservation Effects Assessment Project Croplands Watersheds Studies - Gulf Coast & Western Watersheds (2012)
   Land Management Data within Goodwin Creek Watershed
   Improved Understanding of Erosion Processes and Evaluation of Conservation Practices in Agricultural Watersheds
 
 
Last Modified: 05/19/2013
ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links 
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House