Range Management Research Site Logo
ARS Home About Us Helptop nav spacerContact Us En Espanoltop nav spacer
Printable VersionPrintable Version     E-mail this pageE-mail this page
Agricultural Research Service United States Department of Agriculture
Search
  Advanced Search
 
Programs and Projects
Subjects of Investigation
Ecological Site Descriptions
Monitoring & Assessment
Long Term Ecological Research
Long Term Agricultural Research
Landscape Toolbox
Data Catalogs
EcoTrends
 

Research Project: MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES FOR ARID RANGELANDS

Location: Range Management Research

Title: Performance of the snowmelt runoff model when remotely-sensed estimates of snow covered area are not available

Authors
item Steele, Caitriana -
item Rango, Albert

Submitted to: American Geophysical Union
Publication Type: Abstract Only
Publication Acceptance Date: November 1, 2010
Publication Date: December 13, 2010
Citation: Steele, C., Rango, A. 2010. Performance of the snowmelt runoff model when remotely-sensed estimates of snow covered area are not available [abstract]. 2010 American Geophysical Union (AGU) meeting, December 13-17, 2010. San Francisco, California.

Technical Abstract: The Snowmelt Runoff Model (SRM) is usually run with snow cover depletion data. These daily depletion data can be derived through interpolation of periodic, remotely sensed measurements of basin snow covered area (SCA). It is also possible to run SRM successfully without snow depletion data in “no snow cover” mode. In this mode, accumulated winter precipitation is carried forward into the melt season. SRM will start to melt the accumulated winter precipitation incrementally when a degree-day threshold is passed. It is these data that are used in place of the daily snow cover depletion data.<br /> We compared results from SRM run in three modes of operation: (i) “no snow cover” mode, (ii) with depletion curves interpolated from SCA estimated using fine resolution satellite sensor data (30 m), and (iii) with depletion curves interpolated from SCA estimated using coarse resolution satellite sensor data (500 m). Comparisons were made for an average snow year (2001), a heavy snow year (2008) and a low snow year (2002) over 3 watersheds in the Upper Rio Grande basin. In this paper, we discuss the reasons why estimates of runoff differ between the three modes of operation. Factors that may contribute to the variation in the results include the quantity of precipitation preceding the melt season, basin size, basin elevation, proximity of climate stations and the quality of remotely sensed SCA data. <br /> These results have relevance for water managers. If reasonable estimates of runoff from snowmelt can be obtained in “no snow cover” mode, the usability of SRM is improved for the non-expert in remote sensing or when remotely-sensed SCA data are unreliable (e.g., in years of extreme cloudiness).

   

 
Project Team
Estell, Richard - Rick
Lucero, Mary
Peters, Debra - Deb
Havstad, Kris
Rango, Albert - Al
Herrick, Jeffrey - Jeff
Anderson, Dean
Bestelmeyer, Brandon
 
Publications
   Publications
 
Related National Programs
  Pasture, Forage and Rangeland Systems (215)
 
 
Last Modified: 06/19/2013
ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links 
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House