Pasture Systems & Watershed Management Research Site Logo
ARS Home About Us Helptop nav spacerContact Us En Espanoltop nav spacer
Printable VersionPrintable Version     E-mail this pageE-mail this page
Agricultural Research Service United States Department of Agriculture
Search
  Advanced Search
 
Programs and Projects
Subjects of Investigation
 

Research Project: MANAGING FORAGE AND GRAZING LANDS FOR MULTIPLE ECOSYSTEM SERVICES

Location: Pasture Systems & Watershed Management Research

Title: Case study: molasses as the primary energy supplement on an organic grazing dairy farm

Authors
item Soder, Kathy
item Hoffman, K -
item Chase, L -
item Rubano, Melissa

Submitted to: Professional Animal Scientist
Publication Type: Peer Reviewed Journal
Publication Acceptance Date: December 29, 2011
Publication Date: March 1, 2012
Citation: Soder, K.J., Hoffman, K., Chase, L.E., Rubano, M.D. 2012. Case study: molasses as the primary energy supplement on an organic grazing dairy farm. Professional Animal Scientist. 28:234-243.

Interpretive Summary: Organic dairies face many challenges, one of which is the high cost of purchasing organic feed grains. Many of these farms are seeking lower-cost feed ingredients that can be reasonably fed to lactating dairy cows. Molasses seems to be a viable, less expensive source of supplemental energy and vitamins. However, anecdotal results have been mixed for farms that have used molasses as the sole energy source. This research project quantified milk production and other animal performance measures on an organic dairy farm in central New York that has fed molasses for two grazing seasons. In the current study, increasing corn (and decreasing molasses) had no impact on milk production or milk fat, but resulted in decreased profitability due to higher feed costs. Therefore, in addition to monitoring animal health and productivity, the cost of molasses in relation to corn meal is an important determinant in making feed ration decisions on a case-by-case basis.

Technical Abstract: Organic dairies face many challenges, one of which is the high cost of purchasing organic feed grains. Many of these farms are seeking lower-cost feed ingredients that can be reasonably fed to lactating dairy cows. Molasses seems to be a viable, less expensive source of supplemental energy and vitamins. However, anecdotal results have been mixed for farms that have used molasses as the sole energy source. This could be due to a variety of management or feed quality factors, but it is not currently known which factors have the greatest influence on success, failure, and those in between. This research project quantified milk production and other animal performance measures on an organic dairy farm in central New York that has fed molasses for two grazing seasons. In 2008, 1.36 kg DM of molasses and 0.45 kg DM corn-based grain mix was fed to a mixed-breed herd of organic dairy cows. In 2009, molasses intake was decreased (averaging 1.10 kg DM/cow/d across the grazing season) while corn intake was increased (1.00 kg DM/cow/d) in response to low body condition scores, the potential for greater milk production, and changes in milk to feed ratio. Milk production and milk fat were similar across both years, while milk protein was greater in 2009. Milk urea nitrogen (MUN) levels were greater than recommended throughout the grazing season, primarily due to the high level of soluble protein and rumen degradable protein found in pasture. Body condition score (BCS) was higher in 2009 compared to 2008 and the rate of BCS loss was slower in 2009. When the diets were analyzed using the Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System (CNCPS), energy was the first limiting factor for milk production. In general, actual milk production mirrored that of CNCPS predictions in both years. The CNCPS predictions for MUN were variable compared with actual MUN values, suggesting variation in the ability of cows to efficiently utilize pasture protein. Income over feed costs (IOFC) was greater in 2008, primarily due to higher milk prices and lower corn feeding. In the current study, decreasing molasses and increasing corn meal in the second year (2009) did not result in greater productivity or profitability compared with greater molasses supplementation (2008). However, indicators of animal health and nutritional efficiencies such as BCS and milk protein content were slightly improved in 2009. Although profitability did not improve, if prices had remained constant over the two years, a greater IOFC may have resulted. Therefore, cost of molasses in relation to corn meal is an important determinant in making feed ration decisions. Additionally, animal health and productivity must be monitored closely to evaluate success of molasses supplementation.

   

 
Project Team
Skinner, Robert - Howard
Soder, Kathy
Goslee, Sarah
Adler, Paul
 
Publications
   Publications
 
Related National Programs
  Bioenergy (213)
  Food Animal Production (101)
  Pasture, Forage and Rangeland Systems (215)
 
Related Projects
   PASTURELAND CONSERVATION EFFECTS ASSESSMENT PROJECT LITERATURE SYNTHESEIS
   CONSERVATION PRACTICES IN NORTHEASTERN GRAZING LANDS
   U.S. NATIVE GRASS BREEDING CONSORTIUM TO IDENTIFY REGIONAL OPTIMUM BIOMASS PRODUCTIVITY ON MARGINAL LAND
   MECHANISTIC MODELING OF MULTISPECIES PASTURE GROWTH AND MANAGEMENT
   INTEGRATED PASTURE-CROP ROTATION
   GRAZINGLAND CONSERVATION ASSESSMENT
   GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS AND NITRATE LOSSES FROM ORGANIC SOILS IN DAIRY FARMING SYSTEMS IN NORTHERN GERMANY
   REGIONAL DISTRIBUTION AND ABUNDANCE OF BIOFUEL AND FORAGE SPECIES
   IMPACT OF CONSERVATION PRACTICES ON NUTRIENT TRANSPORT AND FATE IN PASTURE SYSTEMS
   REGIONAL CORN STOVER REMOVAL IMPACT STUDY - AMES (II)
   ASSISTING ORGANIC DAIRY PRODUCERS TO MEET THE DEMANDS OF NEW AND EMERGING MILK MARKETS
   GRAZING LANDS CEAP
   GREENHOUSE GAS LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS OF BIOCHAR EFFECTS ON MARGINAL LAND CONVERSION TO SWITCHGRASS PRODUCTION
 
 
Last Modified: 05/22/2013
ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links 
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House