Soil and Water Management Research Site Logo
ARS Home About Us Helptop nav spacerContact Us En Espanoltop nav spacer
Printable VersionPrintable Version     E-mail this pageE-mail this page
Agricultural Research Service United States Department of Agriculture
Search
  Advanced Search
 
Programs and Projects
Subjects of Investigation
 

Research Project: INCREASING SUSTAINABILITY AND MITIGATING GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS OF FOOD AND BIOFUEL PRODUCTION SYSTEMS OF THE UPPER MIDWEST U.S.

Location: Soil and Water Management Research

Title: Influence of C4 vegetation on 13CO2 discrimination and isoforcing in the upper Midwest, United States

Authors
item Griffis, T -
item Baker, John
item Sargent, S -
item Erickson, M -
item Corcoran, J -
item Chen, M -
item Billmark, K -

Submitted to: American Geophysical Union
Publication Type: Peer Reviewed Journal
Publication Acceptance Date: June 9, 2010
Publication Date: October 26, 2010
Citation: Griffis, T.J., Baker, J.M., Sargent, S.D., Erickson, M., Corcoran, J., Chen, M., Billmark, K. 2010. Influence of C4 vegetation on 13CO2 discrimination and isoforcing in the Upper Midwest, United States. American Geophysical Union. 24(1):1-16.

Interpretive Summary: There are two primary forms of CO2 in the atmosphere, one with carbon 12 and one with carbon 13. Plants preferentially absorb the lighter 12-C form of CO2. However, there are also two main types of plants, C3 and C4, and they discriminate against 13-CO2 to differing degrees. C3 plants discriminate more, so their tissues are depleted in 13-C compared to C4 plants. Most plants in the Upper Midwest U.S. are C3, with the notable exception of corn. Corn distribution continues to expand globally as demands for food and biofuel increase. These systems are highly productive, having a significant impact on carbon and water exchange between the land and atmosphere. Gas analyzers that can separately measure the two isotopologues of CO2 can be used to measure their relative exchange rates, and thus draw inferences about the relative importance of C3 and C4 plants. Here we have investigated the relative impact of agricultural C4 vegetation on the local and regional atmospheric isotopic forcing in the Upper Midwest, United States. The observed isotopic impact was greatest during July, but overall the C4 influence was smaller than expected, illustrating the still dominant role of C3 photosynthetic discrimination on the isotopic signature of the atmosphere. These results are useful for developing and testing global climate models, which can then be used to predict future changes in climate.

Technical Abstract: Agricultural crops with a C4 photosynthetic pathway rapidly expanded across North America as early as 800 A.D. Their distribution continues to expand globally as demands for food and biofuel production increase. These systems are highly productive, having a significant impact on carbon and water exchange between the land and atmosphere. Here, we investigate the relative impact of agricultural C4 vegetation on the 13CO2 photosynthetic discrimination and atmospheric isotopic forcing in the upper Midwest, United States. We address three questions: (1) What is the relative importance of C3 and C4 species to the CO2 budget? (2) How do these different photosynthetic pathways influence the photosynthetic discrimination within this heterogeneous landscape? (3) To what extent does land use change (i.e., a change in C4 crops) impact atmospheric isotopic forcing and the isotopic signature of the atmosphere? These questions are addressed using measurements obtained from the University of Minnesota tall tower (244 m) trace gas observatory (TGO) over the growing seasons of 2007 and 2008 and are supported with scaled-up values of discrimination and isotopic forcing based on ecosystem-scale eddy flux observations and high-resolution land use data. Our land use analyses indicate that local and regional C4 production was higher by 10% in 2007 due to increased demand for biofuel. The 2007 growing season was also characterized by moderate drought as a consequence of low antecedent soil water content. Isotopic flux ratio measurements fromTGO provide evidence that the increase in C4 land use and drier soil conditions of 2007 had a significant impact on the growing season 13CO2 photosynthetic discrimination, which ranged from 11.5 to 14.8 in 2007 and 12.4‰to 17.4‰in 2008. Isotopic partitioning indicated that C4 species accounted for about 20 to 40% of the growing season gross photosynthetic CO2 exchange. The isoforcing analysis revealed that C3 discrimination dominated the atmospheric delta 13C budget, especially during spring and fall. Estimates of 13CO2 photosynthetic discrimination for this region support recently published isotope modeling studies that explicitly accounted for increases in C4 cropland, which has significant implications for estimating the terrestrial carbon sink strength based on inverse modeling techniques.

   

 
Project Team
Venterea, Rodney - Rod
Feyereisen, Gary
Spokas, Kurt
Baker, John
 
Publications
   Publications
 
Related National Programs
  Climate Change, Soils, and Emissions (212)
 
Related Projects
   IMPROVED MEASUREMENT, MONITORING, AND MITIGATION OF NITROUS OXIDE EMISSIONS AND RELATED N LOSSES FROM INTENSIVELY FERTILIZED AGRO-ECOSYSTEMS
   ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF CORN STOVER REMOVAL
   EVALUATING DIFFERENT BIOCHARS AND THEIR IMPACT ON SOIL C, TRACE GAS EXCHANGE, SOIL FERTILITY, WATER HOLDING CAPACITY AND AGROCHEMICAL FATE
   EVALUATION OF NEW MANAGEMENT PRACTICES FOR INCREASING CORN PRODUCTION AND REDUCING ENVIRONMENTAL RISKS FOLLOWING FALL ANHYDROUS AMMONIA
   INTERNATIONAL FIELD VALIDATION OF A NEW IPCC "TIER IV" INVENTORY MODEL FOR LANDFILL METHANE EMISSIONS
   PRECISION ZONAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS FOR RESILIENT CEREAL YIELDS UNDER VARIABLE CLIMATES
   SUSTAINABILITY OF CORN STOVER HARVEST
   BALANCING PRODUCTION GAINS AGAINST ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF NITROGEN FERTILIZER MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
 
 
Last Modified: 05/20/2013
ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links 
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House