Honey Bee Breeding, Genetics, and Physiology Research Site Logo
ARS Home About Us Helptop nav spacerContact Us En Espanoltop nav spacer
Printable VersionPrintable Version     E-mail this pageE-mail this page
Agricultural Research Service United States Department of Agriculture
Search
  Advanced Search
 
Programs and Projects
Subjects of Investigation
Posters
 

Research Project: BREEDING, GENETICS, STOCK IMPROVEMENT AND MANAGEMENT OF RUSSIAN HONEY BEES FOR MITE AND SMALL HIVE BEETLE CONTROL AND POLLINATION

Location: Honey Bee Breeding, Genetics, and Physiology Research

Title: Examination on the Reproductive Success of Re-Invading Varroa Mites

Authors
item Kirrane, Maria -
item De Guzman, Lilia
item Rinderer, Thomas
item Whelan, P -

Submitted to: American Bee Journal
Publication Type: Abstract Only
Publication Acceptance Date: March 3, 2011
Publication Date: May 1, 2011
Citation: Kirrane, M.J., De Guzman, L.I., Rinderer, T.E., Whelan, P.M. 2011. Examination on the Reproductive Success of Re-Invading Varroa Mites. American Bee Journal. 151(5):507.

Technical Abstract: High proportions of non-reproductive (NR) Varroa mites have been reported in honey bee colonies exhibiting resistance to this parasite. This non-reproduction is associated with hygienic behavior (Harris et al., 2010 Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 103: 146-152); however, the mechanism by which this occurs is unknown. Two experiments were designed to assess the reproductive output of re-invading Varroa mites. The first involved the transfer of foundress Varroa from adult bees (PH) and different stages of brood into newly sealed larvae. The brood stages were: newly sealed larvae (SL), pre-pupae (PP), white-eyed (WE) and pink-eyed (PE) pupae. For experiment 2, Varroa mites were obtained from SL and inoculated into SL, PP, WE and PE cells. The transfer technique described by De Ruijter et al. (1987 Apidologie 18:321-326) was used. Reproductive mites were defined as those that produced both a mature male and a mature female offspring. In experiment 1 reproductive success was low overall and mostly observed in the SL to SL transfer (13%, Table). Unsuccessful repro- ductive attempts were highest in SL to PP (61%) transfer followed by SL to SL (22%). A high proportion of Varroa mites coming from WE (83%), PH (89%), and PE (92%) did not produce any progeny. Similar trends were observed in Experiment 2. Successful reproduction only occurred in the transfers to SL (26%). Generally, lack of progeny was not associated with mites having a lack of stored sperm. Our results suggest that mites removed from pre-pupae or older brood cells are unlikely to produce viable daughters. Similarly, if mites enter brood stages other than SL they will likely be non-reproductive. Hence, the ability of honey bees to remove Varroa-infested brood will enhance the pool of NR mites and negatively affect mite population growth in hygienic colonies.

   

 
Project Team
Rinderer, Thomas - Tom
Bourgeois, Lanie
Villa, Joseph - Jose
Holloway, Beth
Tarver, Matthew
De Guzman, Lilia
 
Publications
   Publications
 
Related National Programs
  Crop Production (305)
 
Related Projects
   Genome Characterization of the Mite Varroa Destructor, the Primary Pest of Honey Bees
   DEVELOPMENT OF APIS MELLIFERA SYRIACA GENETIC STOCK WITH INCREASED RESISTANCE TO PARASITIC BEE MITES
   PREPARING FOR VARROA: HOW SUSCEPTIBLE ARE AUSTRALIAN HONEY BEE STOCKS?
 
 
Last Modified: 06/19/2013
ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links 
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House