Title: Nitrogen loss from a mixed land use watershed as influenced by hydrology and seasons Authors
Submitted to: Journal of Hydrology
Publication Type: Peer Reviewed Journal
Publication Acceptance Date: May 18, 2011
Publication Date: May 27, 2011
Citation: Zhu, Q., Schmidt, J.P., Buda, A.R., Bryant, R.B., Folmar, G.J. 2011. Nitrogen loss from a mixed land use watershed as influenced by hydrology and seasons. Journal of Hydrology. 405(3-4):307-315. Interpretive Summary: Nitrogen (N) continues to be a major agrichemical contaminant of the Chesapeake Bay. We investigated when and how N was lost from a 100-acre mixed land use subwatershed of the Chesapeake Bay watershed. Base flow and small storms (less than one-year return period) accounted for the greatest proportion of total stream discharge. Nitrate concentration was also greatest in base and small-storm flow, so the major proportions of nitrate (21 lbs per acre per year or 94 percent) and total N (38 lbs per acre per year or 88 percent) were exported in base flow and small storms. The major proportions of nitrate (75 percent) and total N (74 percent) were also exported from this watershed during the pre-growing (Jan. to April) and post-growing (Oct. to Dec.) seasons as compared to the growing season (May to Sept.). Management practices to reduce nitrogen loss from this watershed should target periods of base flow when nitrate concentrations are greater (before and after the crop growing season) and target areas along the stream where seeps are present, perhaps including perennial plant species in localized riparian buffers and introducing cover crops on the agricultural land during the fallow season.
Technical Abstract: Non-point nitrogen loss from agriculture is an environmental concern among scientists, decision-makers, and the public. This study investigated NO3-N and total N losses from a mixed land use watershed (39.5 ha) in the Appalachian Valley and Ridge Physiographic Province as influenced by hydrology (flow type, runoff volume, storm sizes, and precipitation amount) and seasons (pre-growing, growing, and post-growing seasons) from 2002 to 2006. Stream discharge was monitored every 5-min and water samples for NO3-N and total N analyses were collected weekly for base flow and for every storm. The majority of NO3-N (about 75%) and total N (about 65%) were exported in base flow, which contributed about 64% of the total flow in an average year and had greater flow-weighted mean NO3-N concentration (5.6 mg L L-1) than storm flow (3.4 mg L L-1). A substantial proportion of total N was in the form of NO3-N in base flow (58.2%) and small storms with less than 1-year return period (48.4%), suggesting that base flow and small storm flow were probably dominated by NO3-N -rich lateral subsurface flow. As storm size (runoff volume, flow rate, and return period) increased, the NO3-N concentration decreased following a power relationship. In contrast, total N concentrations increased with increasing storm size, which was attributed to surface runoff that flushed ammonium-N and dissolved and particulate organic N into the stream. The NO3-N and total N losses from this watershed were greater during the pre-growing (Jan.-Apr.) and post-growing (Oct.-Dec.) seasons, which contributed greater than 73% of the overall NO3-N and total N losses. These two seasons also had greater flow-weighted mean NO3-N (4.8 and 5.5 mg L-1, respectively) and total N (9.8 and 10.1 mg L-1, respectively) concentrations and greater discharge (40% and 32% of total discharge, respectively) than during the growing season. Greater contribution of NO3-N to total N loss in storm flow was also observed during the pre-growing and post-growing seasons than during the growing season, while contribution of NO3-N to total N loss (NO3-N concentration/total N concentration) in base flow was consistent across seasons. Management practices to reduce N loss from this watershed should target periods of base flow when NO3-N concentrations are greater (before and after the crop growing season) and target areas along the stream where seeps are present, perhaps including perennial plant species in localized riparian buffers and introducing cover crops on the agricultural land during the fallow season.