Submitted to: Invasive Plant Science and Management
Publication Type: Peer Reviewed Journal
Publication Acceptance Date: April 22, 2010
Publication Date: September 1, 2010
Repository URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10113/46590
Citation: Sheley, R.L., James, J.J. 2010. Resistance of native plant functional groups to invasion by medusahead. Journal of Invasive Plant Science and Management. 3(3):294-300. Interpretive Summary: Ecologically-based invasive annual grass management requires the implementation of effective prevention and restoration strategies (Masters and Sheley 2001). Identifying functional groups of species that hinder invasion or re-invasion by medusahead provide managers direction for focusing efforts on maintaining and promoting the highest priority plants within the community. As we anticipated, perennial grasses play a critically important role in minimizing invasion by medusahead. But, it is unlikely that a single native grass species provide enough niche overlap with this annual grass to prevent invasion because resistance probably requires the sequestration of nutrients from all nutrient pools within the soil profile, which may maximize biomass production (James et al. 2008; Rinella et al. 2007). Since removing shrubs, mosses, and most forbs had limited impact on medusahead, it appears that randomly maximizing species richness or diversity will not convey resistance as well as carefully chosen functional groups. We suggest that carefully selecting 2 or 3 highly productive grasses that are similar in niche to the invading species provides a basis for designing medusahead-resistant plant communities.
Technical Abstract: Understanding the relative importance of various functional groups in minimizing invasion by medusahead is central to increasing the resistance of native plant communities. The objective of this study was to determine the relative importance of key functional groups within an intact Wyoming big sagebrush/ bluebunch wheatgrass community type on minimizing medusahead invasion. Treatments consisted of removal of seven functional groups at each of two sites, one with shrubs and one without shrubs. Removal treatments included 1) everything, 2) shrubs, 3) perennial grasses, 4) tap-rooted forbs, 5) rhizomatous forbs, 6) annual forbs, and 7) mosses. A control where nothing was removed was also established. Plots were arranged in a randomized-complete-block with 4 replications (blocks) at each site. Functional groups were removed beginning in the spring of 2004 and maintained monthly throughout each growing season through 2009. Medusahead was seeded at a rate of 2000 seeds/m2 in fall 2005. Removing perennial grasses nearly doubled medusahead density and biomass compared to any other removal treatment. The second highest density and biomass of medusahead occurred from removing rhizomatous forbs (phlox). We found perennial grasses played a relatively more significant role than other species in minimizing invasion by medusahead. We suggest that the most effective basis for establishing medusahead-resistant plant communities is to establish 2 or 3 highly productive grasses that are complementary in niche, and that overlap that of the invading species.