New England Plant, Soil and Water Research Laboratory Site Logo
ARS Home About Us Helptop nav spacerContact Us En Espanoltop nav spacer
Printable VersionPrintable Version     E-mail this pageE-mail this page
Agricultural Research Service United States Department of Agriculture
Search
  Advanced Search
 
Programs and Projects
Subjects of Investigation
 

Research Project: ENHANCING SUSTAINABILITY OF FOOD PRODUCTION SYSTEMS IN THE NORTHEAST

Location: New England Plant, Soil and Water Research Laboratory

Title: Comparative assessment of pest management practices in potato production at farmer field schools

Authors
item Olanya, Modesto
item Hakiza, Johnson -
item Nelson, Rebecca -
item El-Bedewy, Ramzy -
item Namanda, Sam -
item Kakuhenzire, Rogers -
item Wagoire, Williams -
item Imelda, Kasheija -
item Ngombe, Brima -
item Musoke, Charles -
item Ewell, Peter -

Submitted to: Food Security Journal
Publication Type: Peer Reviewed Journal
Publication Acceptance Date: September 9, 2010
Publication Date: November 17, 2010
Citation: Olanya, O.M., Hakiza, J.J., Nelson, R.J., El-Bedewy, R., Namanda, S., Kakuhenzire, R., Wagoire, W.W., Imelda, K., Ngombe, B., Musoke, C., Ewell, P.T. 2010. Comparative assessment of pest management practices in potato production at farmer field schools. Food Security Journal. 2:327-341.

Interpretive Summary: “Farmer field schools” (FFS) can be valuable tools for directly transferring technology to farmers. We evaluated the usefulness of FFS for improving pest management and agronomic practices in potato production from 1999-2002. To do this, we compared integrated pest management (IPM) practices among farmers participating in field schools with a control group of non-participants. Although production constraints and cultivar preferences were similar between the two groups, differences in pest management, agronomic practices, and the rationale for using those practices were found. This study showed that empowering farmers with knowledge, access to pest and agronomic management options, and participatory experiments can greatly improve potato production and food security in resource constrained potato production systems.

Technical Abstract: Farmer field schools (FFS) and other participatory approaches are useful methods for rapid delivery of agricultural technologies in resource-constrained agro-ecosystems. Cultivar selection, weekly fungicide applications and integrated disease management (IDM) based on a disease monitoring strategy were evaluated at FFS for late blight control. Farmers’ knowledge and perceptions of pest management and agronomic practices were also assessed for FFS participants and non-participants from 1999-2002. Late blight development and tuber yield varied among field schools, but cultivars had significant effects on late blight severity and yield over a range of disease management options relative to the untreated check. FFS participants and non-participants used diverse sources of pest management information, but differed significantly in their management methods and practices. Cultivar resistance and fungicides were ranked as major components of pest control by 18-85% and 7-30% of FFS participants and non-participants, respectively. Differences in knowledge of cropping practices and pest biology, causal agents, disease symptoms, factors favoring disease development, and cultural management of insects and storage pests were recorded. Participatory field experiments, access to resistant cultivars, disease management and use of various agronomic practices can greatly improve pest control and potato production at FFS.

   

 
Project Team
Larkin, Robert - Bob
Halloran, John
 
Publications
   Publications
 
Related National Programs
  Climate Change, Soils, and Emissions (212)
  Agricultural System Competitiveness and Sustainability (216)
  Plant Diseases (303)
 
Related Projects
   ENHANCING FOOD SECURITY OF UNDERSERVED POPULATIONS IN THE NORTHEAST THROUGH SUSTAINABLE REGIONAL FOOD SYSTEMS
 
 
Last Modified: 05/18/2013
ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links 
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House