Page Banner

United States Department of Agriculture

Agricultural Research Service

Research Project: MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES FOR ARID RANGELANDS

Location: Range Management Research

Title: Do sampling methods differ in their utility for ecological monitoring? Comparison of line-point intercept, grid-point intercept, and ocular estimate methods

Authors
item Godinez-Alvarez, Hector - UNIV. NAC AUTO DE MEXICO
item Herrick, Jeffrey
item Mattocks, Mitchelle - NEW MEXICO STATE UNIV
item Toledo, David
item Van Zee, Justin

Submitted to: Ecological Society of America Abstracts
Publication Type: Abstract Only
Publication Acceptance Date: July 15, 2008
Publication Date: August 3, 2008
Citation: Godinez-Alvarez, H., Herrick, J.E., Mattocks, M., Toledo, D.N., Van Zee, J.W. 2008. Do sampling methods differ in their utility for ecological monitoring? Comparison of line-point intercept, grid-point intercept, and ocular estimate methods [abstract]. Ecological Society of America Abstracts. Paper No. PS 83-125.

Technical Abstract: This study compared the utility of three sampling methods for ecological monitoring based on: interchangeability of data (rank correlations), precision (coefficient of variation), cost (minutes/transect), and potential of each method to generate multiple indicators. Species richness and foliar cover by species were measured for each method on four transects (70 m) in 15 sites (three in each of five plant communities) in the northern Chihuahuan Desert. Randomized species accumulation curves and rank correlations of the three methods were conducted with these data.

Last Modified: 9/10/2014
Footer Content Back to Top of Page