Livestock Behavior Research Site Logo
ARS Home About Us Helptop nav spacerContact Us En Espanoltop nav spacer
Printable VersionPrintable Version     E-mail this pageE-mail this page
Agricultural Research Service United States Department of Agriculture
Search
  Advanced Search
Programs and Projects
Subjects of Investigation
 

Research Project: ETHOLOGY OF FOOD PRODUCING ANIMALS

Location: Livestock Behavior Research

Title: Stone chewing

Author

Submitted to: Book Chapter
Publication Type: Book/Chapter
Publication Acceptance Date: April 22, 2007
Publication Date: N/A

Technical Abstract: Picking stones up into the mouth and chewing them has been commonly reported in pigs and also in dogs. It has variously been described as play behavior, redirected foraging behavior or a stereotypic behavior. In pigs, stone chewing is often observed in sows housed on paddocks, and most frequently on paddocks where plant cover has been removed. The major issues surrounding stone chewing involve speculation as to its cause and/or function and potential health problems that it may cause the animal in chewing or swallowing the stones. Horrell & A¿Ness (1999) observed wild boar in a semi-natural environment, and commercial pigs in six different environments. They reported that commercial sows housed on arable land and housed indoors in small straw yards with stones available spent 46.5% and 40% of observation time respectively chewing stones, which was 10-20% more than sows in three grass-based paddock treatments. Wild boar spent less than 1% of their time chewing stones in their enriched environment. Dailey & McGlone (1997) reported that sows on pasture chewed grass, sows in crates chewed the metal bars of the crates, and sows on a soil-covered paddock chewed stones to a similar extent. Both sets of authors conclude that stone chewing represents thwarted foraging behaviour and may be a form of stereotypic behavior, as it is most prevalent in relatively barren environments of bare earth paddocks. Horrell & A¿Ness (1999) hypothesize that it is a function of boredom or a coping response to stress. In terms of health concerns, Davies et al. (2001) examined teeth and stomach contents of indoor- and outdoor-housed sows and found that tooth damage (30% & 28% respectively) and wear (91% & 88% respectively) was in fact very similar in both populations and thus independent of stone-chewing, which was only available to outdoor-housed sows. Even though nearly 40% of outdoor-housed sows had stones in their stomachs, there was no indication that stone-chewing affected the health of the sows.

   

 
Project Team
Lay, Jr, Donald - Don
Marchant-Forde, Jeremy
Cheng, Heng Wei
Eicher, Susan
 
Publications
   Publications
 
Related National Programs
  Food Animal Production (101)
 
Patents
  Method For Increasing Poultry Hens' Egg-Laying Capacity
 
 
Last Modified: 11/21/2009
ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links 
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House