Cropping Systems and Water Quality Research Site Logo
ARS Home About Us Helptop nav spacerContact Us En Espanoltop nav spacer
Printable VersionPrintable Version     E-mail this pageE-mail this page
Agricultural Research Service United States Department of Agriculture
Search
  Advanced Search
 
Programs and Projects
Subjects of Investigation
Water Quality
Irrigation
Soil Quality
Precision Agriculture
Missouri Caves
STEWARDS database
Cooperative Projects
Research Briefs
Videos
 

Research Project: SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGIES FOR SUSTAINABLE SITE-SPECIFIC SOIL AND CROP MANAGEMENT

Location: Cropping Systems and Water Quality Research

Title: ECONOMICALLY OPTIMAL NITROGEN RATE REDUCES SOIL RESIDUAL NITRATE

Authors
item Hong, Nan - UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI
item Scharf, Peter - UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI
item Davis, J - USDA-NRCS
item Kitchen, Newell
item Sudduth, Kenneth

Submitted to: ASA-CSSA-SSSA Annual Meeting Abstracts
Publication Type: Abstract Only
Publication Acceptance Date: November 14, 2006
Publication Date: November 14, 2006
Citation: Hong, N., Scharf, P.C., Davis, J.G., Kitchen, N.R., Sudduth, K.A. 2006. Economically optimal nitrogen rate reduces soil residual nitrate. ASA-CSSA-SSSA Annual Meeting Abstracts.

Technical Abstract: Practices that minimize post-harvest residual soil NO3-N (RSN) can reduce N loss to the environment. Our objectives were to determine if the RSN after corn (Zea mays L.) harvest can be reduced if N fertilizer is applied at the economically optimal N rate (EONR) as compared to current producers' practices in the midwestern U.S., and to compare RSN levels if no N fertilizer is applied to RSN levels if N fertilizer is applied at a rate below, at, or above the EONR. Six experiments were conducted in producers' fields over 2 yrs. At four transects in each field, six treatment N rates from 0 to 280 kg/ha were applied, the EONR was determined, and the RSN was sampled to a 0.9-m depth from five treatment plots. The EONR at sampling sites varied from 49 to 228 kg/ha depending on site-year. Estimated average RSN at the EONR was 27 kg/ha in the 0.9-m profile. Applying fertilizer N at the EONR reduced the RSN by at least 11 kg/ha compared to the producer's rate. The RSN increased with increasing difference from EONR (total N applied - EONR). When the difference from EONR < 0, average RSN was 21 kg/ha and was not different than if total N applied was zero or equal to the EONR. When 0 < the difference from EONR < 50 kg/ha, average RSN increased to 39 kg/ha, but was not greater than when the difference from EONR = 0. When 50 < the difference from EONR < 100, average RSN increased to 49 kg/ha, and was greater than when the difference from EONR = 0. When the difference from EONR > 100 kg ha-1, average RSN significantly increased to 91 kg/ha. Our results suggest that applying the EONR will produce environmental benefits in an economically sound matter.

   

 
Project Team
Sudduth, Kenneth - Ken
Sadler, Edward - John
Vories, Earl - Earl
Kitchen, Newell
Lerch, Robert - Bob
Kremer, Robert - Bob
 
Publications
   Publications
 
Related National Programs
  Agricultural System Competitiveness and Sustainability (216)
  Water Availability and Water Management (211)
  Soil Resource Management (202)
 
 
Last Modified: 06/18/2013
ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links 
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House