Hometop nav spacerAbout ARStop nav spacerHelptop nav spacerContact Ustop nav spacerEn Espanoltop nav spacer
Printable VersionPrintable Version     E-mail this pageE-mail this page
United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service
Search
 
 
 
National Programs
International Programs
Find Research Projects
The Research Enterprise
Office of Scientific Quality Review
Research Initiatives
 

Title: USING TERRAIN ANALYSIS TO PLAN THE PLACEMENT OF CONSERVATION PRACTICES IN A WATERSHED

Authors
item Tomer, Mark
item James, David
item Isenhart, T - DNR ECOL. & MGMT, ISU

Submitted to: Midwest Fish and Wildlife Conference
Publication Type: Abstract Only
Publication Acceptance Date: December 10, 2003
Publication Date: December 10, 2003
Citation: Tomer, M.D., James, D.E., Isenhart, T.M. 2003. Using terrain analysis to plan the placement of conservation practices in a watershed [CD-ROM]. Kansas City, MO: Midwest Fish and Wildlife Conference.

Technical Abstract: Riparian buffers and constructed wetlands are two best management practices (BMPs) that can improve water quality. However, these practices are not equally effective in all locations. Our objective was to develop maps to help plan the placement of BMPs in a watershed for water quality benefits. Tipton Creek, a 49,000-acre Iowa watershed, provided a case study. Buffer-placement maps, developed from analysis of a 30-m digital elevation model, identified riparian locations with large wetness indices, where buffer vegetation could intercept sheet/rill flows from significant upslope areas. These sites were numerous, usually small (<200 m in length) and well distributed across the watershed's riparian areas. Candidate wetland sites were also mapped by interpreting maps of drainage area and slope, and by applying automated techniques to elevation data. A team of conservation professionals reviewed and discussed the maps in the field. Buffer maps highlighted riparian areas where perennial vegetation could effectively intercept runoff and/or manage seasonal wetness. The review team also located three feasible wetland sites, which were all identified by an automated mapping technique that provided twelve candidate sites meeting specific criteria for a USDA-supported program encouraging installation of constructed wetlands. The methods only required public data and should be applicable to other watersheds where good-quality DEM data are available. Results show that terrain analysis can provide hydrologic criteria to identify priority areas for implementing conservation practices, and that maps based of these analyses provide information that is consistent with human interpretation.

   
 
 
Last Modified: 05/23/2013
ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links 
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House