Page Banner

United States Department of Agriculture

Agricultural Research Service

Title: Thresholds of Leaf Nitrogen for Optimum Fruit Production and Quality in Grapefruit

Authors
item He, Z - UNIV OF FLORIDA,FT PIERCE
item Calvert, D - UNIV OF FLORIDA,FT PIERCE
item Alva, Ashok
item Banks, D - UNIV OF FLORIDA,FT PIERCE
item Li, Y - UNIV OF FLORIDA,HOMESTEAD

Submitted to: Soil Science Society of America Journal
Publication Type: Peer Reviewed Journal
Publication Acceptance Date: December 1, 2002
Publication Date: March 1, 2003
Citation: HE, Z.L., CALVERT, D.V., ALVA, A.K., BANKS, D.J., LI, Y.C. THRESHOLDS OF LEAF NITROGEN FOR OPTIMUM FRUIT PRODUCTION AND QUALITY IN GRAPEFRUIT. SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 67:583-588. 2003.

Interpretive Summary: Leaf analysis for nutrient contents is a standard technique to examine the status of nutrients in orange trees, which can be used to correct the deficiencies. Critical concentrations of nutrients in the leaves are being established for orange trees but not for grapefruit trees. This paper is based on the results of 4 years field experiment on 'White Marsh' grapefruit trees on 'sour orange' rootstock grown on a Tavares fine sand along the east coast of Florida. Fertilizer was applied using either water soluble granular form (WSG), fertigation (FRT), or controlled release fertilizer (CRF) at five N rates (0, 50, 100, 150, or 200 lbs N/ac/yr). The N:P:K ratio of the fertilizer was 1.0:0.17:1.02, therefore, along with N rates, P and K rates also varied. Generally, critical concentrations are established on the basis of 90 percent of maximum yield. Accordingly, the critical value for leaf N was 2.2 to 2.3 percent. At this range of leaf N concentraton, fruit size as well as soluble solid content were also at the optimal range. This long term field study demonstrated that 2.2 to 2.3 percent leaft N content is optimal for grapefruit trees for production of high yields of good quality grapefruits.

Technical Abstract: Fertilization is critical for sustainable production of citrus on sandy soils. However, information on nutritional diagnosis standards for grapefruit (Citrus x paradisi Macfad.) is lacking and this information is needed for implementation of best management practices (BMPs). A field experiment was conducted from 1997 to 2000 on a Riviera fine sand (loamy, silliceous, hyperthermic, Arenic Glossaqualf) with 30-yr-old+ white Marsh grapefruit trees on sour orange (Citrus aurantium L.) rootstock to evaluate irrigation and fertilization effects on fruit yield and quality and to validate leaf nutrient concentration standards for guiding fertilization of grapefruit. Fertilizers were applied as water soluble granular (WSG, 3 applications yr-1), by fertigation (FRT, 15 applications yr-1), or as controlled-release fertilizers (CRF, 1 application yr-1) and at five rates (0, 56, 112, 168, or 224 kg N ha-1yr-1) with an N:P:K blend (1.0:0:17:1.02). Fruit yield and quality were not affected by irrigation treatments or fertilizer sources. There was a significantly positive correlation between leaf N concentrations and N rates (r=0.98**). Fruit yield was linearly related to N rates or leaf N concentrations. At 90 percent of maximum yield, leaf N concentrations (dry weight basis) were 22 to 23 g kg-1. Fruit quality parameters such as soluble solid concentration (SSC), juice, and total soluble solids (TSS) were positively correlated with leaf N concentrations, whereas fruit titratable acidity (TA) was negatively related to leaf N concentrations or N rates. The effect of N rate on TA outweighed that on SSC and consequently, the SSC/TA ratio decreased with increasing N rates or leaf N concentration. Fruit size was quadratically related to N rate or leaf N concentration. Overall, fruit sizes and SSC/TA ratios were acceptable for fresh marketing or processing at leaf N concentrations of 22 to 23 g kg-1. Therefore, this leaf N concentration of 22 to 23 g kg-1 can be considered the optimal concentration guideline for fertilization of grapefruit provided that other nutrients are sufficient.

Last Modified: 8/29/2014
Footer Content Back to Top of Page