Environmental Management Research Site Logo
ARS Home About Us Helptop nav spacerContact Us En Espanoltop nav spacer
Printable VersionPrintable Version     E-mail this pageE-mail this page
Agricultural Research Service United States Department of Agriculture
Search
  Advanced Search
 
Programs and Projects
Subjects of Investigation
 

Title: Manual and Thermal Induced Feed Intake Restriction on Finishing Barrows. I:effects on Growth, Carcass Composition, and Feeding Behavior

Authors
item Brown Brandl, Tami
item Nienaber, John
item Turner, Larry - UNIV KENTUCKY
item Yen, Jong Tseng

Submitted to: Transactions of the ASAE
Publication Type: Peer Reviewed Journal
Publication Acceptance Date: April 20, 2000
Publication Date: N/A

Interpretive Summary: It is well documented that animals exposed to hot environmental conditions eat less and grow slower. It was not known if the reduced growth rate was a result of the hot conditions or only caused by reduced feed intake. An experiment was designed to study the effects of hot conditions separate from the effects of reduced feed intake. It was found that at high levels of heat stress pigs grew at the same rate as pigs at cool conditions but had a larger percentage of fat. However, at moderate levels of heat stress the pigs grew at the same rate and had similar levels of fat.

Technical Abstract: Sixty Large White x Landrace barrows (65.2 plus/minus 0.5 kg) were randomly assigned to one of five treatments: control, two levels of temperature imposed feeding restriction (13%HS, 26%HS) and two levels of manual feed restriction at thermoneutral (13%TN, 26%TN). Feeding behavior was monitored continuously in the control, 13%HS and 26%HS treatment groups. Weekly weights and bi-monthly ultrasound backfats were taken. The pigs were slaughtered at an average treatment weight of 107.5 kg. The offal and the left half of the carcass were ground separately and analyzed for protein, fat, water and ash. The 26%HS treatment group was found to have significantly higher fat deposition and lower protein deposition than the 26%TN treatment group (P<0.05). Ultrasound backfat indicated similar trends in carcass fat and protein differences.

   
 
 
Last Modified: 05/25/2013
ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links 
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House