Coastal Plain Soil, Water and Plant Conservation Research Site Logo
ARS Home About Us Helptop nav spacerContact Us En Espanoltop nav spacer
Printable VersionPrintable Version     E-mail this pageE-mail this page
Agricultural Research Service United States Department of Agriculture
Search
  Advanced Search
 
Programs and Projects
Subjects of Investigation
Cotton Project Overall View
Manure Project Overall View
Soil Project Overall View
Water project Overall View
Second Generation Treatment System
 

Title: MINIMUM TILLAGE CULTIVATION IN A HARDPAN SOIL

Authors
item Busscher, Warren
item Bauer, Philip
item Reeves, Donald
item Langdale, George - RETIRED
item Burt, Eddie

Submitted to: Annual Southern Conservation Tillage Conference for Sustainable Agriculture
Publication Type: Proceedings
Publication Acceptance Date: April 15, 1996
Publication Date: N/A

Interpretive Summary: Deep tillage increases production in hardpan soils of the southeastern Coastal Plain. During times of stress, it may be necessary for plant survival. Deep tillage is usually done with a subsoiler that disrupts soil sixteen inches deep, but only below the row, not between rows. A relatively new cultivator, the Brown Chiselvator, disrupts soil to eight inches between rows while controlling weeds and leaving residues on the surface where they can protect soil from erosion. We tested the Chiselvator in a cotton field to find out if its eight-inch-deep disruption between rows improved plant growth and yield. Cultivation softened the soil, even when used in combination with the subsoiler. While subsoiling improved plant growth and yields, cultivation did not. This information is important to researchers and producers developing improved cotton production systems for the Coastal Plain.

Technical Abstract: To reduce strength in a hardpan soil, a high-residue cultivator with 8-in-d and both subsoiling and cultivation. Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) was planted into standing winter ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.) or winter fallow. Cultivation significantly lowered soil strength over not tilling. When performed with subsoiling, it lowered strength over subsoiling only. Yield was increased by subsoiling. Yields in cultivated plots were similar to those in non-cultivated plots. Yields for fallow plots were higher than for the rye cover. Though the cultivator decreased soil strength, it did not improve plant characteristics or yield.

   
 
 
Last Modified: 06/19/2013
ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links 
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House