Hometop nav spacerAbout ARStop nav spacerHelptop nav spacerContact Ustop nav spacerEn Espanoltop nav spacer
Printable VersionPrintable Version     E-mail this pageE-mail this page
United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service
Search
 
 
 
National Programs
International Programs
Find Research Projects
The Research Enterprise
Office of Scientific Quality Review
Research Initiatives
 

Research Project: HEADQUARTERS COOPERATIVE PROGRAMS - FOOD NUTRITION, SAFETY AND QUALITY (FNSQ) Title: What do government agencies consider in the debate over added sugars

Author

Submitted to: Advances in Nutrition
Publication Type: Peer Reviewed Journal
Publication Acceptance Date: September 17, 2012
Publication Date: N/A

Interpretive Summary: Americans consume on average one-third of a pound of sugar daily and one in ten derives more than a quarter of their calories from sugars. Because of the large increase in obesity, scientists and policy-makers have tried to tie changes in eating to this and many have linked consumption of added sugars to obesity. However, there is no scientific consensus on this connection. There is more compelling evidence that an increase in portion sizes, eating occasions, and a shift toward more foods with low nutrient density have all contributed to obesity. There is no evidence, only theory, to support taxation or regulation of sugar-containing foods to reduce obesity. Since so many foods have been linked with obesity, the rationale for focusing on soft drinks is weak. Government should consider the totality of the evidence including the strength of the relationship of sugar intake with various health outcomes.

Technical Abstract: The place of sugars in the U.S. diet is vigorously debated with much attention on added sugars, those added during processing or preparation of foodstuffs, particularly as they relate to obesity. Federal government agencies have different responsibilities related to the food supply including research, food safety, nutrition assistance, and labeling; therefore, the interpretation of evidence differs depending on the role of the agency. Some common references for government agency positions are the Dietary Reference Intakes and the Dietary Guidelines for Americans, which together form the foundation for much of federal nutrition policy. Sugar consumption has increased in proportion to intake of other nutrients since 1980, when obesity began to increase substantially. Median intake of added sugars is approximately 12% of energy while total sugar intake is about 22% or energy. While there are differences in the way individual monosaccharides are metabolized, they are rarely consumed alone. A key issue related to obesity is likely the increased number of eating occasions and portion size for many indulgent foods – grain-based snacks have become the biggest source of energy in the U.S. diet. There are currently insufficient data to justify a decision on regulation or taxation of sugar-containing foods and such as approach must be weighed against personal freedoms; the list of foods associated with obesity includes many commonly eaten items and it is not likely they are all causally related. Government should consider the totality of the evidence including the strength of the relationship of sugar intake with various health outcomes.

   

 
Project Team
Klurfeld, David
Torrence, Mary
Finley, John
Fireovid, Robert - Bob
Lindsay, James
 
Publications
   Publications
 
Related National Programs
  General National Program (990)
 
Related Projects
   MOU BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND THE NATIONAL VETERINARY INSTITUTE - NORWAY
   MOU BETWEEN THE USDA/ARS AND THE INSTITUTE OF CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY
   MOU BETWEEN THE USDA/ARS AND THE U.S. CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION
   SOY-BASED INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS
   MOU BETWEEN USDA/ARS AND THE ACADEMY OF FINLAND
   INDIVIDUALIZED NUTRITION: INTERACTIONS BETWEEN PLANT FOOD CONSUMPTION AND HUMAN HEALTH OUTCOMES
   MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN USDA/ARS AND FINNISH FUNDING AGENCY FOR TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION (TEKES)
   COLLABORATION BETWEEN ARS AND EUROPEAN FOOD SAFETY AUTHORITY
   MOU BETWEEN THE USDA/ARS AND THE FOOD STANDARDS AGENCY OF THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND
   MOU BETWEEN THE U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION AND THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE RESEARCH, EDUCATION, AND ECONOMICS
   MOU BETWEEN USDA/ARS AND THE INSTITUTE FOR FOOD SAFETY AND HEALTH, AND ADMINISTRATIVE UNIT OF ILLINOIS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
   MOU BETWEEN USDA/ARS AND THE UNIVERSITY COURT OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN, UNITED KINGDOM
   MOU BETWEEN USDA/ARS AND THE UNIVERSITY OF STIRLING, SCOTLAND
   PILOT TESTING PROJECT FOR ON FARM SAMPLING FOR NARMS
   PILOT TESTING PROJECT FOR ANIMAL NARMS SAMPLING - TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY
   PILOT TESTING PROJECT FOR ANIMAL NARMS SAMPLING - UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA
   PILOT TESTING PROJECT FOR ANIMAL NARMS SAMPLING - UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
   MOU BETWEEN ARS AND THE INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND RESEARCH
   MOU BETWEEN ARS AND THE CENTRO DE INVESTIGACIÓN EN ALIMENTACIÓN Y DESARROLLO (CIAD)
   SUPPORT OF CONFERENCE TITLED: "ENERGY BALANCE AT A CROSSROADS: TRANSLATING SCIENCE INTO ACTION"
   MOU BETWEEN USDA/ARS AND THE FOOD AND ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH AGENCY, DEPARTMENT FOR ENVIRONMENT, FOOD AND RURAL AFFAIRS (UNITED KINGDOM)
   PILOT TESTING PROJECT FOR ANIMAL NARMS SAMPLING
   MOU BETWEEN USDA/ARS AND THE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN CENTRE FOR FOOD SAFETY
   WORKSHOP ON THE NEUROBIOLOGY OF FOOD INTAKE AND BEHAVIOR
   MOU between the USDA/ARS and RIKILT – Wageningen UR
   MOU between the USDA/ARS and Cranfield University, United Kingdom
 
 
Last Modified: 05/18/2013
ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links 
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House