Subtropical Plant Pathology Research Site Logo
ARS Home About Us Helptop nav spacerContact Us En Espanoltop nav spacer
Printable VersionPrintable Version     E-mail this pageE-mail this page
Agricultural Research Service United States Department of Agriculture
Search
  Advanced Search
 
Programs and Projects
Subjects of Investigation
 

Research Project: Alternatives to methyl bromide soil fumigation for vegetable and floriculture production

Location: Subtropical Plant Pathology Research

Title: Grafting as a Production System Component for Nematode Management in Florida Vegetables

Authors

Submitted to: Journal of Phytopathology
Publication Type: Abstract Only
Publication Acceptance Date: March 18, 2012
Publication Date: N/A

Interpretive Summary: Trials in Florida evaluated grafting for control of root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) in tomato, cantaloupe, and pepper. Pepper rootstocks assessed included ‘Charleston Hot’, ‘Carolina Wonder’, ‘Charleston Belle’, ‘Mississippi Nemaheart’, and ‘Carolina Cayenne’, which were resistant to galling. The non-grafted and self-grafted ‘Aristotle’ scion, and several other pepper rootstocks were susceptible. In inoculated microplot trials conducted with tomatoes, juveniles (J2) of M. incognita in soil were similar among all tomato rootstocks, but the number of J2 in roots was higher in non-grafted ‘FL-47’ than in any grafted rootstocks. In cantaloupe, Cucumis metuliferus rootstock reduced galling while ‘Tetsukabuto’ did not reduce galling or J2 in soil or roots. Grafted tomatoes and melons in a double-crop field trial showed that ‘FL-47’ tomato on ‘Multifort’ rootstock had the healthiest roots, but the number of M. incognita J2 recovered from roots was similar for all rootstocks. Galling was highest in non-fumigated plots with non-grafted plants. For melon, M. incognita J2 in soil did not differ, but J2 in roots were higher in ‘Tetsukabuto’ than in C. metuliferus. C. metuliferus had less galling following all tomato rootstocks and in all fumigant treatments compared with the non-grafted ‘Athena’ and ‘Tetsukabuto’. Grafting can provide some control of root-knot nematodes under subtropical conditions and can be combined with other soil treatments for more effective control.

Technical Abstract: Trials in Florida evaluated grafting for control of root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) in tomato, cantaloupe, and pepper. Pepper rootstocks assessed included ‘Charleston Hot’, ‘Carolina Wonder’, ‘Charleston Belle’, ‘Mississippi Nemaheart’, and ‘Carolina Cayenne’, which were resistant to galling. The non-grafted and self-grafted ‘Aristotle’ scion, and several other pepper rootstocks were susceptible. In inoculated microplot trials conducted with tomatoes, juveniles (J2) of M. incognita in soil were similar among all tomato rootstocks, but the number of J2 in roots was higher in non-grafted ‘FL-47’ than in any grafted rootstocks. In cantaloupe, Cucumis metuliferus rootstock reduced galling while ‘Tetsukabuto’ did not reduce galling or J2 in soil or roots. Grafted tomatoes and melons in a double-crop field trial showed that ‘FL-47’ tomato on ‘Multifort’ rootstock had the healthiest roots, but the number of M. incognita J2 recovered from roots was similar for all rootstocks. Galling was highest in non-fumigated plots with non-grafted plants. For melon, M. incognita J2 in soil did not differ, but J2 in roots were higher in ‘Tetsukabuto’ than in C. metuliferus. C. metuliferus had less galling following all tomato rootstocks and in all fumigant treatments compared with the non-grafted ‘Athena’ and ‘Tetsukabuto’. Grafting can provide some control of root-knot nematodes under subtropical conditions and can be combined with other soil treatments for more effective control.

   

 
Project Team
Chellemi, Daniel
Rosskopf, Erin
Burelle, Nancy
Gottwald, Timothy
 
Publications
   Publications
 
Related National Programs
  Methyl Bromide Alternatives (308)
 
 
Last Modified: 05/20/2013
ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links 
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House